Difference between revisions of "Talk:GTM Cyclops"

From FreeSpace Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m (hi)
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
So, what kind of warhead does it use? Antimatter? Fission? Fusion? Fission and Fusion? Matter-antimatter annihilation? --[[User:FlamingCobra|FlamingCobra]] 19:26, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
 
So, what kind of warhead does it use? Antimatter? Fission? Fusion? Fission and Fusion? Matter-antimatter annihilation? --[[User:FlamingCobra|FlamingCobra]] 19:26, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
 
: "Non-conventional" could be any of those, and it could even vary among different versions of the Cyclops. I think that's as far as canon will get you. [[User:Qent|Qent]] 20:01, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
 
: "Non-conventional" could be any of those, and it could even vary among different versions of the Cyclops. I think that's as far as canon will get you. [[User:Qent|Qent]] 20:01, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
 +
::"Could it be a weapon that disrupts subatomic particles at the quark level? --[[User:FlamingCobra|FlamingCobra]] 21:31, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
 +
:::There is no canon information to suggest this. Unless this has some relevance to the Wiki coverage of this topic, this discussion probably belongs on the forum. - [[User:Snail|Snail]] 22:15, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
 +
::::Qent, the word "non-conventional" is not even in the article.  Where did you get that?
 +
::::: The description in the Weapon Selection screen (Retail only; MVPs change it to be more informative). [[User:Qent|Qent]] 07:23, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
 +
:Just to be sure - [[User:Snail|Snail]] 11:56, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
 +
+Description:
 +
XSTR(
 +
"Special Issue
 +
Anti-Cruiser Bomb
 +
Non-Conventional Warhead
 +
", -1)
 +
$end_multi_text

Latest revision as of 11:56, 8 July 2011

So, what kind of warhead does it use? Antimatter? Fission? Fusion? Fission and Fusion? Matter-antimatter annihilation? --FlamingCobra 19:26, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

"Non-conventional" could be any of those, and it could even vary among different versions of the Cyclops. I think that's as far as canon will get you. Qent 20:01, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
"Could it be a weapon that disrupts subatomic particles at the quark level? --FlamingCobra 21:31, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
There is no canon information to suggest this. Unless this has some relevance to the Wiki coverage of this topic, this discussion probably belongs on the forum. - Snail 22:15, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
Qent, the word "non-conventional" is not even in the article. Where did you get that?
The description in the Weapon Selection screen (Retail only; MVPs change it to be more informative). Qent 07:23, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
Just to be sure - Snail 11:56, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
+Description:
XSTR(
"Special Issue
Anti-Cruiser Bomb
Non-Conventional Warhead
", -1)
$end_multi_text