Talk:NTF Rebellion - Revision history

SypheDMar at 19:23, 29 April 2020

2020-04-29T19:23:15Z

Mustang19 at 14:47, 16 April 2008

2008-04-16T14:47:34Z

Monitor at 20:00, 15 April 2008

2008-04-15T20:00:55Z

Snail at 20:49, 14 April 2008

2008-04-14T20:49:07Z

Mustang19 at 19:17, 14 April 2008

2008-04-14T19:17:32Z

Snail: Sorry I forgot to put my signature in

2008-04-14T16:46:00Z

Sorry I forgot to put my signature in

Snail: /* Canonicity */

2008-04-14T16:45:41Z

‎Canonicity

Mustang19: fixed my comment

2008-04-14T15:50:48Z

fixed my comment

Mustang19 at 15:49, 14 April 2008

2008-04-14T15:49:28Z

Aardwolf at 03:00, 26 March 2007

2007-03-26T03:00:03Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:23, 29 April 2020
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==Canonicity==		==Canonicity==
		+
		+	Can anyone confirm the August 20th dating as the start of the Mystery of the Trinity? [[User:SypheDMar\|SDM]] ([[User talk:SypheDMar\|talk]])

	I removed the non-canon tag because the article doesn't appear to have that much speculative information. If anyone spots such information it would be best to simply remove it. I've already edited the article to identify some of the non-canon dates. [[User:Mustang19\|Mustang19]] 10:49, 14 April 2008 (CDT)		I removed the non-canon tag because the article doesn't appear to have that much speculative information. If anyone spots such information it would be best to simply remove it. I've already edited the article to identify some of the non-canon dates. [[User:Mustang19\|Mustang19]] 10:49, 14 April 2008 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:47, 16 April 2008
Line 10:		Line 10:

	It's a wiki, just change it, and if anyone doesn't like it they can revert it in a couple clicks. --[[User:Monitor\|Monitor]] 15:00, 15 April 2008 (CDT)		It's a wiki, just change it, and if anyone doesn't like it they can revert it in a couple clicks. --[[User:Monitor\|Monitor]] 15:00, 15 April 2008 (CDT)
		+
		+	Amen to Monitor. Also, I added a note at the top regarding the dates, although it might not be obnoxious enough to get everyone's attention. From my experience it seems like people on the internet tend to miss anything that isn't allcaps size 36 font. [[User:Mustang19\|Mustang19]] 09:47, 16 April 2008 (CDT)

	==Italicized ship names==		==Italicized ship names==

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:00, 15 April 2008
Line 8:		Line 8:

	Thing is, if I tried that then my opinion would be unimportant in comparison to say, Wanderer's, since I've only been contributing for a while. Anyway, what I'm saying is that you're putting the dates down as if they are fully canon - Without non-canon tags or gray text - When the dates are certainly not canon. After briefly skimming through, I haven't actually seen anything saying "The dates are not canon." This would bring someone who wouldn't know better to the conclusion that the information is all canon, when it is explicit fanon. This is a classic case of canon being obscured by fanon. [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 15:49, 14 April 2008 (CDT)		Thing is, if I tried that then my opinion would be unimportant in comparison to say, Wanderer's, since I've only been contributing for a while. Anyway, what I'm saying is that you're putting the dates down as if they are fully canon - Without non-canon tags or gray text - When the dates are certainly not canon. After briefly skimming through, I haven't actually seen anything saying "The dates are not canon." This would bring someone who wouldn't know better to the conclusion that the information is all canon, when it is explicit fanon. This is a classic case of canon being obscured by fanon. [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 15:49, 14 April 2008 (CDT)
		+
		+	It's a wiki, just change it, and if anyone doesn't like it they can revert it in a couple clicks. --[[User:Monitor\|Monitor]] 15:00, 15 April 2008 (CDT)

	==Italicized ship names==		==Italicized ship names==

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:49, 14 April 2008
Line 6:		Line 6:

	It doesn't matter who's in charge. This is a wiki, everyone contributes. In fact, I've never heard anyone call themselves the "boss" of FSWiki, even the admins- if you have an idea you're just as entitled to your opinion as anyone else. As for the dates, there's still a lot of useful canon reference info here, so a better option might be to say "the Trinity was found in the nebula ''around'' this date" instead of "the Trinity ''was'' found on this date". Since dates are never mentioned in mission briefings, we can only estimate, as for all we know command briefings could have taken place days before their following missions. [[User:Mustang19\|Mustang19]] 14:17, 14 April 2008 (CDT)		It doesn't matter who's in charge. This is a wiki, everyone contributes. In fact, I've never heard anyone call themselves the "boss" of FSWiki, even the admins- if you have an idea you're just as entitled to your opinion as anyone else. As for the dates, there's still a lot of useful canon reference info here, so a better option might be to say "the Trinity was found in the nebula ''around'' this date" instead of "the Trinity ''was'' found on this date". Since dates are never mentioned in mission briefings, we can only estimate, as for all we know command briefings could have taken place days before their following missions. [[User:Mustang19\|Mustang19]] 14:17, 14 April 2008 (CDT)
		+
		+	Thing is, if I tried that then my opinion would be unimportant in comparison to say, Wanderer's, since I've only been contributing for a while. Anyway, what I'm saying is that you're putting the dates down as if they are fully canon - Without non-canon tags or gray text - When the dates are certainly not canon. After briefly skimming through, I haven't actually seen anything saying "The dates are not canon." This would bring someone who wouldn't know better to the conclusion that the information is all canon, when it is explicit fanon. This is a classic case of canon being obscured by fanon. [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 15:49, 14 April 2008 (CDT)

	==Italicized ship names==		==Italicized ship names==

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:17, 14 April 2008
Line 4:		Line 4:

	Personally, I absolutely loathe having these non-canon dates in all the history sections. If I was in charge I'd remove them, but since I'm not I'll leave them. I would, however, like to put the non-canon tag back in, since they are non-canon. This is exactly the sort of thing that confuses people. Someone who simply has a 10 second glance at the timeline to look for a certain event won't see your non-canon disclaimer, and they'll think it's all canon. [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 11:46, 14 April 2008 (CDT)		Personally, I absolutely loathe having these non-canon dates in all the history sections. If I was in charge I'd remove them, but since I'm not I'll leave them. I would, however, like to put the non-canon tag back in, since they are non-canon. This is exactly the sort of thing that confuses people. Someone who simply has a 10 second glance at the timeline to look for a certain event won't see your non-canon disclaimer, and they'll think it's all canon. [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 11:46, 14 April 2008 (CDT)
		+
		+	It doesn't matter who's in charge. This is a wiki, everyone contributes. In fact, I've never heard anyone call themselves the "boss" of FSWiki, even the admins- if you have an idea you're just as entitled to your opinion as anyone else. As for the dates, there's still a lot of useful canon reference info here, so a better option might be to say "the Trinity was found in the nebula ''around'' this date" instead of "the Trinity ''was'' found on this date". Since dates are never mentioned in mission briefings, we can only estimate, as for all we know command briefings could have taken place days before their following missions. [[User:Mustang19\|Mustang19]] 14:17, 14 April 2008 (CDT)

	==Italicized ship names==		==Italicized ship names==

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 I removed the non-canon tag because the article doesn't appear to have that much speculative information. If anyone spots such information it would be best to simply remove it. I've already edited the article to identify some of the non-canon dates. [[User:Mustang19|Mustang19]] 10:49, 14 April 2008 (CDT)
-Personally, I absolutely loathe having these non-canon dates in all the history sections. If I was in charge I'd remove them, but since I'm not I'll leave them. I would, however, like to put the non-canon tag back in, since they are non-canon. This is exactly the sort of thing that confuses people. Someone who simply has a 10 second glance at the timeline to look for a certain event won't see your non-canon disclaimer, and they'll think it's all canon.
+Personally, I absolutely loathe having these non-canon dates in all the history sections. If I was in charge I'd remove them, but since I'm not I'll leave them. I would, however, like to put the non-canon tag back in, since they are non-canon. This is exactly the sort of thing that confuses people. Someone who simply has a 10 second glance at the timeline to look for a certain event won't see your non-canon disclaimer, and they'll think it's all canon. [[User:Snail|Snail]] 11:46, 14 April 2008 (CDT)
 ==Italicized ship names==

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:45, 14 April 2008
Line 2:		Line 2:

	I removed the non-canon tag because the article doesn't appear to have that much speculative information. If anyone spots such information it would be best to simply remove it. I've already edited the article to identify some of the non-canon dates. [[User:Mustang19\|Mustang19]] 10:49, 14 April 2008 (CDT)		I removed the non-canon tag because the article doesn't appear to have that much speculative information. If anyone spots such information it would be best to simply remove it. I've already edited the article to identify some of the non-canon dates. [[User:Mustang19\|Mustang19]] 10:49, 14 April 2008 (CDT)
		+
		+	Personally, I absolutely loathe having these non-canon dates in all the history sections. If I was in charge I'd remove them, but since I'm not I'll leave them. I would, however, like to put the non-canon tag back in, since they are non-canon. This is exactly the sort of thing that confuses people. Someone who simply has a 10 second glance at the timeline to look for a certain event won't see your non-canon disclaimer, and they'll think it's all canon.

	==Italicized ship names==		==Italicized ship names==

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 ==Canonicity==
-I removed the non-canon tag because the article doesn't appear to have any speculative information. If anyone spots such information it would be best to simply remove it. [[User:Mustang19|Mustang19]] 10:49, 14 April 2008 (CDT)
+I removed the non-canon tag because the article doesn't appear to have that much speculative information. If anyone spots such information it would be best to simply remove it. I've already edited the article to identify some of the non-canon dates. [[User:Mustang19|Mustang19]] 10:49, 14 April 2008 (CDT)
 ==Italicized ship names==

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:49, 14 April 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	==Canonicity==
		+
		+	I removed the non-canon tag because the article doesn't appear to have any speculative information. If anyone spots such information it would be best to simply remove it. [[User:Mustang19\|Mustang19]] 10:49, 14 April 2008 (CDT)
		+
		+	==Italicized ship names==
		+
	Does anyone have any hard data or definite dates for any events in FS2? [[User:Galemp\|Galemp]] 22:02, 21 Nov 2005 (CET)		Does anyone have any hard data or definite dates for any events in FS2? [[User:Galemp\|Galemp]] 22:02, 21 Nov 2005 (CET)

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:00, 26 March 2007
Line 23:		Line 23:
	== SOC Operatives/NTF Saboteurs ==		== SOC Operatives/NTF Saboteurs ==

−	This is crap. I am removing it. Whoever put it in can go suck on a lemon.[[User:Aardwolf\|Aardwolf]] 20:59, 25 March 2007 (CST)	+	This is crap. I am removing it. Whoever put it in can go suck on a lemon.[[User:Aardwolf\|Aardwolf]] 20:59, 25 March 2007 (CST) Never mind. I see it is already gone.