User talk:BlueFlames - Revision history

BlueFlames: Formatting.

2009-04-14T16:34:33Z

Formatting.

Mobius: Note about disambiguations

2009-03-29T20:34:49Z

Note about disambiguations

TopAce at 16:57, 27 March 2009

2009-03-27T16:57:32Z

TopAce: /* Spoiler template */ new section

2009-03-27T13:07:34Z

‎Spoiler template: new section

SpaceFreak at 09:51, 8 January 2009

2009-01-08T09:51:11Z

BlueFlames: /* User page */

2008-03-24T17:02:58Z

‎User page

Mustang19 at 15:06, 24 March 2008

2008-03-24T15:06:17Z

Bruce89: comment

2007-08-01T15:00:59Z

comment

BlueFlames: /* Weapon pages */

2007-07-30T19:33:55Z

‎Weapon pages

Wanderer: weapon template

2007-07-30T19:27:47Z

weapon template

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 So, i see you have started editing the pages. But one quick question... Should we write the calculated damage vs each potential target (shield, hull, subsys) or just multipliers as in some cases the multipliers are really, really odd? - [[User:Wanderer|Wanderer]] 14:25, 30 July 2007 (CDT)
 :Also.. now that we have potentially useful template it would be best (imo) if we would make use of it. - [[User:Wanderer|Wanderer]] 14:27, 30 July 2007 (CDT)
+::Most of the multipliers in the default FS2 weapons aren't all that odd.  It might be worth adding the fully calculated damage as a parenthetical, after the multiplier.  More information can't hurt, after all.  I'll round out the player primaries this way, and fill in the extra bits later on.  Your point about the template is also valid, but for right now, I'm more interested in getting the correct information assembled.  Cleaning things up is a bit secondary to me, at the moment.  -- [[User:BlueFlames|BlueFlames]] 16:34, 14 April 2009 (UTC) (post-dated)
-Most of the multipliers in the default FS2 weapons aren't all that odd.  It might be worth adding the fully calculated damage as a parenthetical, after the multiplier.  More information can't hurt, after all.  I'll round out the player primaries this way, and fill in the extra bits later on.  Your point about the template is also valid, but for right now, I'm more interested in getting the correct information assembled.  Cleaning things up is a bit secondary to me, at the moment.
+:::Thanks for adding my template on the weapon pages, I couldn't be bothered when I made it, sorry. [[User:Bruce89|Bruce89]] 10:00, 1 August 2007 (CDT)
 ==User page==
 Nice... those tables must have took hours. [[User:Mustang19|Mustang19]] 09:06, 24 March 2008 (CST)
+:They did turn out to be pretty time-consuming.  Would have been a whole lot quicker if the wiki software had a means of importing Excel spreadsheets, but that'd probably wind up being more labor for the administrators than it'd be worth.  [[User:BlueFlames|BlueFlames]] 11:02, 24 March 2008 (CST)
 ==Crossing the Styx==
@@ Line 20: / Line 17: @@
 == Spoiler template ==
-*It's here: [[Template:Spoiler]].  - [[User:TopAce|TopAce]] 13:07, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
+It's here: [[Template:Spoiler]].  - [[User:TopAce|TopAce]] 13:07, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
-**Now, I'm wondering that, too. It used to be there. I don't know where it went, but I'm adding a note to the main page. - [[User:TopAce|TopAce]] 16:57, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
+:Now, I'm wondering that, too. It used to be there. I don't know where it went, but I'm adding a note to the main page. - [[User:TopAce|TopAce]] 16:57, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
 Please note that entries in disambiguation pages should not be generic. You need to specify if each entry is canon or non-canon and you also need to point entries to their respective campaigns/mods. --- [[User:Mobius|Mobius]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:34, 29 March 2009
Line 22:		Line 22:
	*It's here: [[Template:Spoiler]]. - [[User:TopAce\|TopAce]] 13:07, 27 March 2009 (UTC)		*It's here: [[Template:Spoiler]]. - [[User:TopAce\|TopAce]] 13:07, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
	**Now, I'm wondering that, too. It used to be there. I don't know where it went, but I'm adding a note to the main page. - [[User:TopAce\|TopAce]] 16:57, 27 March 2009 (UTC)		**Now, I'm wondering that, too. It used to be there. I don't know where it went, but I'm adding a note to the main page. - [[User:TopAce\|TopAce]] 16:57, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
		+
		+
		+	==Disambiguations==
		+	Please note that entries in disambiguation pages should not be generic. You need to specify if each entry is canon or non-canon and you also need to point entries to their respective campaigns/mods. --- [[User:Mobius\|Mobius]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:57, 27 March 2009
Line 21:		Line 21:

	*It's here: [[Template:Spoiler]]. - [[User:TopAce\|TopAce]] 13:07, 27 March 2009 (UTC)		*It's here: [[Template:Spoiler]]. - [[User:TopAce\|TopAce]] 13:07, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
		+	**Now, I'm wondering that, too. It used to be there. I don't know where it went, but I'm adding a note to the main page. - [[User:TopAce\|TopAce]] 16:57, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:07, 27 March 2009
Line 17:		Line 17:

	Yeah, you're right. I meant July 2009. Thanks. [[User:SpaceFreak\|SpaceFreak]] 03:51, 8 January 2009 (CST)		Yeah, you're right. I meant July 2009. Thanks. [[User:SpaceFreak\|SpaceFreak]] 03:51, 8 January 2009 (CST)
		+
		+	== Spoiler template ==
		+
		+	*It's here: [[Template:Spoiler]]. - [[User:TopAce\|TopAce]] 13:07, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:51, 8 January 2009
Line 13:		Line 13:

	* They did turn out to be pretty time-consuming. Would have been a whole lot quicker if the wiki software had a means of importing Excel spreadsheets, but that'd probably wind up being more labor for the administrators than it'd be worth. [[User:BlueFlames\|BlueFlames]] 11:02, 24 March 2008 (CST)		* They did turn out to be pretty time-consuming. Would have been a whole lot quicker if the wiki software had a means of importing Excel spreadsheets, but that'd probably wind up being more labor for the administrators than it'd be worth. [[User:BlueFlames\|BlueFlames]] 11:02, 24 March 2008 (CST)
		+
		+	==Crossing the Styx==
		+
		+	Yeah, you're right. I meant July 2009. Thanks. [[User:SpaceFreak\|SpaceFreak]] 03:51, 8 January 2009 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:02, 24 March 2008
Line 11:		Line 11:

	Nice... those tables must have took hours. [[User:Mustang19\|Mustang19]] 09:06, 24 March 2008 (CST)		Nice... those tables must have took hours. [[User:Mustang19\|Mustang19]] 09:06, 24 March 2008 (CST)
		+
		+	* They did turn out to be pretty time-consuming. Would have been a whole lot quicker if the wiki software had a means of importing Excel spreadsheets, but that'd probably wind up being more labor for the administrators than it'd be worth. [[User:BlueFlames\|BlueFlames]] 11:02, 24 March 2008 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:06, 24 March 2008
Line 7:		Line 7:

	Thanks for adding my template on the weapon pages, I couldn't be bothered when I made it, sorry. [[User:Bruce89\|Bruce89]] 10:00, 1 August 2007 (CDT)		Thanks for adding my template on the weapon pages, I couldn't be bothered when I made it, sorry. [[User:Bruce89\|Bruce89]] 10:00, 1 August 2007 (CDT)
		+
		+	==User page==
		+
		+	Nice... those tables must have took hours. [[User:Mustang19\|Mustang19]] 09:06, 24 March 2008 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:00, 1 August 2007
Line 5:		Line 5:

	Most of the multipliers in the default FS2 weapons aren't all that odd. It might be worth adding the fully calculated damage as a parenthetical, after the multiplier. More information can't hurt, after all. I'll round out the player primaries this way, and fill in the extra bits later on. Your point about the template is also valid, but for right now, I'm more interested in getting the correct information assembled. Cleaning things up is a bit secondary to me, at the moment.		Most of the multipliers in the default FS2 weapons aren't all that odd. It might be worth adding the fully calculated damage as a parenthetical, after the multiplier. More information can't hurt, after all. I'll round out the player primaries this way, and fill in the extra bits later on. Your point about the template is also valid, but for right now, I'm more interested in getting the correct information assembled. Cleaning things up is a bit secondary to me, at the moment.
		+
		+	Thanks for adding my template on the weapon pages, I couldn't be bothered when I made it, sorry. [[User:Bruce89\|Bruce89]] 10:00, 1 August 2007 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:33, 30 July 2007
Line 3:		Line 3:
	So, i see you have started editing the pages. But one quick question... Should we write the calculated damage vs each potential target (shield, hull, subsys) or just multipliers as in some cases the multipliers are really, really odd? - [[User:Wanderer\|Wanderer]] 14:25, 30 July 2007 (CDT)		So, i see you have started editing the pages. But one quick question... Should we write the calculated damage vs each potential target (shield, hull, subsys) or just multipliers as in some cases the multipliers are really, really odd? - [[User:Wanderer\|Wanderer]] 14:25, 30 July 2007 (CDT)
	:Also.. now that we have potentially useful template it would be best (imo) if we would make use of it. - [[User:Wanderer\|Wanderer]] 14:27, 30 July 2007 (CDT)		:Also.. now that we have potentially useful template it would be best (imo) if we would make use of it. - [[User:Wanderer\|Wanderer]] 14:27, 30 July 2007 (CDT)
		+
		+	Most of the multipliers in the default FS2 weapons aren't all that odd. It might be worth adding the fully calculated damage as a parenthetical, after the multiplier. More information can't hurt, after all. I'll round out the player primaries this way, and fill in the extra bits later on. Your point about the template is also valid, but for right now, I'm more interested in getting the correct information assembled. Cleaning things up is a bit secondary to me, at the moment.

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:27, 30 July 2007
Line 2:		Line 2:

	So, i see you have started editing the pages. But one quick question... Should we write the calculated damage vs each potential target (shield, hull, subsys) or just multipliers as in some cases the multipliers are really, really odd? - [[User:Wanderer\|Wanderer]] 14:25, 30 July 2007 (CDT)		So, i see you have started editing the pages. But one quick question... Should we write the calculated damage vs each potential target (shield, hull, subsys) or just multipliers as in some cases the multipliers are really, really odd? - [[User:Wanderer\|Wanderer]] 14:25, 30 July 2007 (CDT)
		+	:Also.. now that we have potentially useful template it would be best (imo) if we would make use of it. - [[User:Wanderer\|Wanderer]] 14:27, 30 July 2007 (CDT)