This is in french, sorry but i can't translate actually.
A rough translation:
Chapter 1: Testing on the GTD Zeus taks place. In the mean time, they also discover a Knossos. They also uncover a SD Lucifer. Allied forces have managed to capture the Lucifer. They also discovered the TSM and the TSD Apocalypse.
Chapter 2 (GTVA point of view): The destructon of the TSM fleet takes place in this chapter. While the TSD Archangel's destruction was taking place, the GTVA has also managed to capture the TSD Apocalypse. The GTVA then traveled through the Knossos device and discovered two more Knossos Battlegroups. The exploration ended up in diaster, and they also lost the GTD Zeus as well.
Chapter 3 (TSM point of view) The attack on the GTI S.R.I. took part, and in response to the recent attack, the GTVA declared war on the TSM. However, the TSM then also managed to destroy the GTD Zeus and GTD Loraine. To counter this, the GTVA made an Exodus through the Knossos device.
Nubbles 03:50, 28 June 2008 (CDT)
What the bloody hell is this? - Snail 04:49, 28 June 2008 (CDT)
I guess it's a mod. But there is so much non-canon stuff that it doesn't make sense - to us, at least.
- Does the GTD Zeus get destroyed twice? - TopAce 09:21, 28 June 2008 (CDT)
This mod take place just after the capella destruction, i made a lot of non-canon stuff. And the first and the second branche are two different story: in a mission, players have a choice between the GTVA and the TSF ( Terran-Shivan Front ), the GTD Zeus isn't destroyed twice. Eolis 11:40 30 June 2008
- I see. I thought the chapters were chronologically ordered. - TopAce 03:39, 1 July 2008 (CDT)
Ok, so we part of that sorted out. Heres the next question want to ask: Shouldn't all the articles be written in the third person form rather than first person. So, for example, Eolin uses "I" when he refers to something he is doing. However, most other wikis prefer people writing "The Author" or "The Maker." Just wanted to know whether or not FSW has this rule as well.Nubbles 04:08, 1 July 2008 (CDT)
- We should have this rule. I didn't want to nitpick about it, because then some articles might need a heavy rewrite or deletion. For campaigns or missions, we could probably have an "Author's comments" section that could be written in the 1st person. - TopAce 05:11, 1 July 2008 (CDT)