Difference between revisions of "Talk:AF Phylaki"

From FreeSpace Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(what to do?)
 
(reply)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
The story of this model goes as follows: it was originall made for INFR1 (with this name, AF Phylaki). It was released with the INFR1 extras, but with no tables. It ''was'' in the INFSCP modpack until the ancients were scrapped. It first appeared as the Preacher in BP:AoA after Darius took the model and re-textured it, however, it was initially intended to be an Ancient model, and the ASW version has the same name as INF had originally, we kept the same name for all the ships that used to be in INFSCP, for convienience. Now, let me get to the point: which page should be linked on the user-made ships page? I don't mind this one being the one with all the 'story' stuff on it, keeping the BP page with the BP banner clean and focused on the Vishnan fighter. Otherwise, we could do it the other way around, and put the history/links on that page. Or, we could fuse the two pages (turn this one back into a redirect to the other one), but given the fact that the fighters have totally different names, totally different universes and even speices, it might be confusing. Which should it be? - [[User:Droid803|Droid803]] 21:36, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
 
The story of this model goes as follows: it was originall made for INFR1 (with this name, AF Phylaki). It was released with the INFR1 extras, but with no tables. It ''was'' in the INFSCP modpack until the ancients were scrapped. It first appeared as the Preacher in BP:AoA after Darius took the model and re-textured it, however, it was initially intended to be an Ancient model, and the ASW version has the same name as INF had originally, we kept the same name for all the ships that used to be in INFSCP, for convienience. Now, let me get to the point: which page should be linked on the user-made ships page? I don't mind this one being the one with all the 'story' stuff on it, keeping the BP page with the BP banner clean and focused on the Vishnan fighter. Otherwise, we could do it the other way around, and put the history/links on that page. Or, we could fuse the two pages (turn this one back into a redirect to the other one), but given the fact that the fighters have totally different names, totally different universes and even speices, it might be confusing. Which should it be? - [[User:Droid803|Droid803]] 21:36, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
 +
 +
the usermade ships page should link to the ASW/INFSCP name, that can have a link to the preacher creature [[User:General Battuta|General Battuta]] 01:41, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 01:41, 31 December 2010

The story of this model goes as follows: it was originall made for INFR1 (with this name, AF Phylaki). It was released with the INFR1 extras, but with no tables. It was in the INFSCP modpack until the ancients were scrapped. It first appeared as the Preacher in BP:AoA after Darius took the model and re-textured it, however, it was initially intended to be an Ancient model, and the ASW version has the same name as INF had originally, we kept the same name for all the ships that used to be in INFSCP, for convienience. Now, let me get to the point: which page should be linked on the user-made ships page? I don't mind this one being the one with all the 'story' stuff on it, keeping the BP page with the BP banner clean and focused on the Vishnan fighter. Otherwise, we could do it the other way around, and put the history/links on that page. Or, we could fuse the two pages (turn this one back into a redirect to the other one), but given the fact that the fighters have totally different names, totally different universes and even speices, it might be confusing. Which should it be? - Droid803 21:36, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

the usermade ships page should link to the ASW/INFSCP name, that can have a link to the preacher creature General Battuta 01:41, 31 December 2010 (UTC)