Difference between revisions of "Talk:OT"

From FreeSpace Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(I agree with Snail)
Line 2: Line 2:
 
*I do use that acronym. The Yes to No ratio is 1:1. --- [[User:Mobius|Mobius]]
 
*I do use that acronym. The Yes to No ratio is 1:1. --- [[User:Mobius|Mobius]]
 
**You're also the only person who uses the acronym I believe. As I said, it has to be an ''established'' acronym, not a random one. -- [[User:Snail|Snail]] 19:29, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
 
**You're also the only person who uses the acronym I believe. As I said, it has to be an ''established'' acronym, not a random one. -- [[User:Snail|Snail]] 19:29, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
 
+
**Unfortunately, he's right.  I have NEVER heard OT used.  Try not to pull random acronyms out of the air when making a contribution. -- [[User:Sigtau|sigtau]]
Unfortunately, he's right.  I have NEVER heard OT used.  Try not to pull random acronyms out of the air when making a contribution.
 

Revision as of 19:32, 7 June 2009

Since when does "OT" stand for Operation Thresher? I've never seen that acronym used anywhere before now. I don't think it's appropriate to just make up random acronyms and redirect everything. It has to be an established and understood acronym before redirecting can happen IMO. - Snail 17:56, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

  • I do use that acronym. The Yes to No ratio is 1:1. --- Mobius
    • You're also the only person who uses the acronym I believe. As I said, it has to be an established acronym, not a random one. -- Snail 19:29, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
    • Unfortunately, he's right. I have NEVER heard OT used. Try not to pull random acronyms out of the air when making a contribution. -- sigtau