Difference between revisions of "Talk:Ricochet Effect"

From FreeSpace Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Reply to TopAce added)
m
 
Line 3: Line 3:
 
*Yes, it is necessary until a new Inferno template gets inserted into the article. - [[User:TopAce|TopAce]] 21:11, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
 
*Yes, it is necessary until a new Inferno template gets inserted into the article. - [[User:TopAce|TopAce]] 21:11, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
 
**Isn't that a bit unconvenient? We'll then have to remove the template on all articles that will be created in the future. I suggest to create a generic Inferno template ASAP so that we won't have any problems. --- [[User:Mobius|Mobius]]
 
**Isn't that a bit unconvenient? We'll then have to remove the template on all articles that will be created in the future. I suggest to create a generic Inferno template ASAP so that we won't have any problems. --- [[User:Mobius|Mobius]]
 +
***That template is not permanent. We need some template to indicate the article's non-canon state in a certain way. If someone accesses this article one millisecond after you have removed the non-canon template, he'll think that the Ricochet Effect is canon. I don't see the problem with future articles, though. Feel free to go ahead and create a generic Inferno template that makes it '''explicit''' that Inferno is non-canon. That's when the generic non-canon template becomes inconvenient for Inferno-related articles. - [[User:TopAce|TopAce]] 21:50, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 21:50, 25 March 2009

"Non-canon" template

Is that template necessary? There should be a new INF template very soon. --- Mobius

  • Yes, it is necessary until a new Inferno template gets inserted into the article. - TopAce 21:11, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
    • Isn't that a bit unconvenient? We'll then have to remove the template on all articles that will be created in the future. I suggest to create a generic Inferno template ASAP so that we won't have any problems. --- Mobius
      • That template is not permanent. We need some template to indicate the article's non-canon state in a certain way. If someone accesses this article one millisecond after you have removed the non-canon template, he'll think that the Ricochet Effect is canon. I don't see the problem with future articles, though. Feel free to go ahead and create a generic Inferno template that makes it explicit that Inferno is non-canon. That's when the generic non-canon template becomes inconvenient for Inferno-related articles. - TopAce 21:50, 25 March 2009 (UTC)