Difference between revisions of "Talk:Silent Threat: Reborn continuity"
From FreeSpace Wiki
m (bleh) |
(Reply) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
G-canon kinda implies that it is in some way canon, which it ain't. How's about we rename it G-''fanon''? After all, it's fanon not canon. - [[User:Snail|Snail]] 21:16, 7 June 2009 (UTC) | G-canon kinda implies that it is in some way canon, which it ain't. How's about we rename it G-''fanon''? After all, it's fanon not canon. - [[User:Snail|Snail]] 21:16, 7 June 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | *Sorry, but I don't understand. First of all, ''G-canon'' is the term I read on HLP so using a different term would be pointless (I'm not inventing anything). Also, I'd like to remember that the article specifies that G-canon isn't V canon. We have several terms with the word canon on them (like "INF canon") which surely aren't connected to V. --- [[User:Mobius|Mobius]] | ||
Revision as of 21:24, 7 June 2009
G-canon kinda implies that it is in some way canon, which it ain't. How's about we rename it G-fanon? After all, it's fanon not canon. - Snail 21:16, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
- Sorry, but I don't understand. First of all, G-canon is the term I read on HLP so using a different term would be pointless (I'm not inventing anything). Also, I'd like to remember that the article specifies that G-canon isn't V canon. We have several terms with the word canon on them (like "INF canon") which surely aren't connected to V. --- Mobius
