Difference between revisions of "Talk:Stars and Planets"

From FreeSpace Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(reply)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Can planets ''seen'' but never ''mentioned'' in-game be considered quasi-canon? --[[User:FlamingCobra|FlamingCobra]] 22:51, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
 
Can planets ''seen'' but never ''mentioned'' in-game be considered quasi-canon? --[[User:FlamingCobra|FlamingCobra]] 22:51, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
 
*I think that's reasonable. However, those planets seen in the FSPort missions are 100% non-canon, since those were added by the FSPort team and not present in the original missions. The original FS1 did not have any planet bitmaps. (CBanims and cutscenes are a different story, of course) - [[User:Snail|Snail]] 10:23, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
 
*I think that's reasonable. However, those planets seen in the FSPort missions are 100% non-canon, since those were added by the FSPort team and not present in the original missions. The original FS1 did not have any planet bitmaps. (CBanims and cutscenes are a different story, of course) - [[User:Snail|Snail]] 10:23, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
 +
**Really? What about this [[File:Betelgeuse_BG_Planet.png]] and this [[File:Antares_BG_Planet.png]]? They came straight from the original FreeSpace 1 campaign. --[[User:FlamingCobra|FlamingCobra]] 15:13, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 10:13, 12 June 2011

Can planets seen but never mentioned in-game be considered quasi-canon? --FlamingCobra 22:51, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

  • I think that's reasonable. However, those planets seen in the FSPort missions are 100% non-canon, since those were added by the FSPort team and not present in the original missions. The original FS1 did not have any planet bitmaps. (CBanims and cutscenes are a different story, of course) - Snail 10:23, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
    • Really? What about this Betelgeuse BG Planet.png and this Antares BG Planet.png? They came straight from the original FreeSpace 1 campaign. --FlamingCobra 15:13, 12 June 2011 (UTC)