Difference between revisions of "TerSlash"

From FreeSpace Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Veteran Comments)
(update)
Line 4: Line 4:
 
==Description==
 
==Description==
 
Terran slashing anti-capital ship beam weapon
 
Terran slashing anti-capital ship beam weapon
 
==Veteran Comments==
 
''The major trouble with all "slash" type beams, is that they are inconsistant. The Slashers tend to slash past there target, somtimes inflicting more or less damage, whereas solid beams, however statistically inferior, either hits or misses, and usually hits. The TerSlash in preticular has negitive feelings assosiated with it, as a symbol of [[Terran]] technological inferiority. Typically the TerSlash is compared to the [[SRed]], the beam mounted on the [[SCv Moloch]], as even though the TerSlash does 2.2X the sustained damage, the [[SRed]] is far more accurate.''<br><br>
 
''Slash weapons do however, have a few good things about them. From my experience, they are very effective at close range, and they can sometimes destroy a few turrets or subsystems in one slash. However, any warship using this should have beam cannons to compensate for its lack of power over long range.
 
  
 
==Performance==
 
==Performance==
 
===Statistics===
 
===Statistics===
{|
+
{{Beam|4000|10|2|Slashing|1|1 925|3 850}}
|-
+
 
| style="width:200px" | '''Range'''
+
==Notes==
| style="width:200px" | 4000 m
+
 
|-
+
===Veteran Comments===
| '''Rate of Fire'''
+
''The major trouble with all "slash" type beams, is that they are inconsistent. The Slashers tend to slash past there target, sometimes inflicting more or less damage, whereas solid beams, however statistically inferior, either hits or misses, and usually hits. The TerSlash in particular has negative feelings associated with it, as a symbol of [[Terran]] technological inferiority. Typically the TerSlash is compared to the [[SRed]], the beam mounted on the [[SCv Moloch]], as even though the TerSlash does 2.2X the sustained damage, the [[SRed]] is far more accurate.''
| 10 s
+
 
|-
+
 
| '''Velocity'''
+
''Slash weapons do however, have a few good things about them. From my experience, they are very effective at close range, and they can sometimes destroy a few turrets or subsystems in one slash. However, any warship using this should have beam cannons to compensate for its lack of power over long range.
| Instant
 
|-
 
| '''Damage''' per second
 
| 1925
 
|-
 
| '''Damage''' per pulse
 
| 3850
 
|-
 
| Against Hullplating
 
| Excellent
 
|-
 
| Against Shields
 
| Excellent
 
|-
 
| Against Subsystems
 
| Excellent
 
|}
 
  
===Notes===
 
  
 
[[Category:Weapon]]
 
[[Category:Weapon]]

Revision as of 13:09, 11 August 2007

Terran Slashing Beam is a beam used by the Terrans in the Freespace 2

Primaries
Secondaries
Turrets

Weapon Comparison Table, FS1

Primaries
Secondaries
Turrets

Weapon Comparison Table, FS2


Description

Terran slashing anti-capital ship beam weapon

Performance

Statistics

Range 4000 m
Recharge Time 10 s
Beam Lifetime 2 s
Type: Slashing
Shots 1
Damage per second 1 925
Damage per second (sustained) 3 850
Damage per pulse {{{8}}}


Notes

Veteran Comments

The major trouble with all "slash" type beams, is that they are inconsistent. The Slashers tend to slash past there target, sometimes inflicting more or less damage, whereas solid beams, however statistically inferior, either hits or misses, and usually hits. The TerSlash in particular has negative feelings associated with it, as a symbol of Terran technological inferiority. Typically the TerSlash is compared to the SRed, the beam mounted on the SCv Moloch, as even though the TerSlash does 2.2X the sustained damage, the SRed is far more accurate.


Slash weapons do however, have a few good things about them. From my experience, they are very effective at close range, and they can sometimes destroy a few turrets or subsystems in one slash. However, any warship using this should have beam cannons to compensate for its lack of power over long range.