RE: Your suggestion for the TBP ships; basically I'm using the thing that I am for that because I directly copied the entry for the Ulysses and its components, and from there on I've gone ahead copying from my last entry and altering what needs to be changed. So I probably won't be changing those anytime soon. If it bothers you that much you're welcome to alter them, but as the functional equivalent is the same, I really can't be moved to care much. ngtm1r
No problems. I also got a few ideas from the entry you made. Like building all the table files around the same format for easier reference (Yeah, i must be dreaming, only an idiot would have this kind of ideas... ...what that makes out of me?). Wanderer 19:05, 13 Nov 2005 (CET)
Big thanks for all the work you're doing on individual ship entries - I've put in a request with the admins for some official recognition, probably a custom user title on the forums, though the actual title will be admin discretion (as will the granting of it in the first place, but personally I reckon you're a shoe in). Black Wolf 05:14, 16 Dec 2005 (GMT)
Nice job maintining the FS Wiki --Nubbles 22:10, 16 June 2007
The ship images are great. Good job. --Mars 20:34, 20 June 2006 (BST)
Thank you, Wanderer, for holding off the bots. The Hard Light community owes you one. Mustang19
Nice work, though damn if it's not weird seeing us both do a series of edits at the same time.
- Yeah... That would have been me... Mainly related to the problems in general in describing game plot elements and effects in wikipedia. - Wanderer 05:52, 21 February 2008 (CST)
Censorship! Censorship, I say!
Seriously, thanks for dealing with the spambots in a timely manner. -- BlueFlames 20:01, 9 January 2009 (CST)
More, big thanks
Great job on updating those articles and creating new, specific templates for the most recent FSO branches. Those additions are impressive. Keep it up! =) --- Mobius