Difference between revisions of "Talk:SCP Additions"
From FreeSpace Wiki
m |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Instead of doing a loooong list of rules, a template entry with additional explanations to why the template is a good model is far more explanatory. Anyone got a better idea? [[User:Ni1s|ni1s]] 14:28, 25 July 2007 (CDT) | Instead of doing a loooong list of rules, a template entry with additional explanations to why the template is a good model is far more explanatory. Anyone got a better idea? [[User:Ni1s|ni1s]] 14:28, 25 July 2007 (CDT) | ||
:How about just using a separate article? - [[User:Wanderer|Wanderer]] 14:41, 25 July 2007 (CDT) | :How about just using a separate article? - [[User:Wanderer|Wanderer]] 14:41, 25 July 2007 (CDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I agree with both. Just after the Rules warning just put the link to the other page (so the list page will be kept clearer). But maybe we will need to keep here the list of ''official'' categories. Also, although the rules seem quite long and boring, they are just the explanation of how a post is built. But an example template is also a good addition to the rules. ARSPR 26 July 2007 | ||
Latest revision as of 16:23, 26 July 2007
Posting Rules
Instead of doing a loooong list of rules, a template entry with additional explanations to why the template is a good model is far more explanatory. Anyone got a better idea? ni1s 14:28, 25 July 2007 (CDT)
- How about just using a separate article? - Wanderer 14:41, 25 July 2007 (CDT)
I agree with both. Just after the Rules warning just put the link to the other page (so the list page will be kept clearer). But maybe we will need to keep here the list of official categories. Also, although the rules seem quite long and boring, they are just the explanation of how a post is built. But an example template is also a good addition to the rules. ARSPR 26 July 2007
