Difference between revisions of "Talk:GTM Cyclops"
From FreeSpace Wiki
m (hi) |
|||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
So, what kind of warhead does it use? Antimatter? Fission? Fusion? Fission and Fusion? Matter-antimatter annihilation? --[[User:FlamingCobra|FlamingCobra]] 19:26, 7 July 2011 (UTC) | So, what kind of warhead does it use? Antimatter? Fission? Fusion? Fission and Fusion? Matter-antimatter annihilation? --[[User:FlamingCobra|FlamingCobra]] 19:26, 7 July 2011 (UTC) | ||
: "Non-conventional" could be any of those, and it could even vary among different versions of the Cyclops. I think that's as far as canon will get you. [[User:Qent|Qent]] 20:01, 7 July 2011 (UTC) | : "Non-conventional" could be any of those, and it could even vary among different versions of the Cyclops. I think that's as far as canon will get you. [[User:Qent|Qent]] 20:01, 7 July 2011 (UTC) | ||
| + | ::"Could it be a weapon that disrupts subatomic particles at the quark level? --[[User:FlamingCobra|FlamingCobra]] 21:31, 7 July 2011 (UTC) | ||
| + | :::There is no canon information to suggest this. Unless this has some relevance to the Wiki coverage of this topic, this discussion probably belongs on the forum. - [[User:Snail|Snail]] 22:15, 7 July 2011 (UTC) | ||
| + | ::::Qent, the word "non-conventional" is not even in the article. Where did you get that? | ||
| + | ::::: The description in the Weapon Selection screen (Retail only; MVPs change it to be more informative). [[User:Qent|Qent]] 07:23, 8 July 2011 (UTC) | ||
| + | :Just to be sure - [[User:Snail|Snail]] 11:56, 8 July 2011 (UTC) | ||
| + | +Description: | ||
| + | XSTR( | ||
| + | "Special Issue | ||
| + | Anti-Cruiser Bomb | ||
| + | Non-Conventional Warhead | ||
| + | ", -1) | ||
| + | $end_multi_text | ||
Latest revision as of 11:56, 8 July 2011
So, what kind of warhead does it use? Antimatter? Fission? Fusion? Fission and Fusion? Matter-antimatter annihilation? --FlamingCobra 19:26, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
- "Non-conventional" could be any of those, and it could even vary among different versions of the Cyclops. I think that's as far as canon will get you. Qent 20:01, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
- "Could it be a weapon that disrupts subatomic particles at the quark level? --FlamingCobra 21:31, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
- There is no canon information to suggest this. Unless this has some relevance to the Wiki coverage of this topic, this discussion probably belongs on the forum. - Snail 22:15, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
- Qent, the word "non-conventional" is not even in the article. Where did you get that?
- The description in the Weapon Selection screen (Retail only; MVPs change it to be more informative). Qent 07:23, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
- Qent, the word "non-conventional" is not even in the article. Where did you get that?
- There is no canon information to suggest this. Unless this has some relevance to the Wiki coverage of this topic, this discussion probably belongs on the forum. - Snail 22:15, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
- "Could it be a weapon that disrupts subatomic particles at the quark level? --FlamingCobra 21:31, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
- Just to be sure - Snail 11:56, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
+Description: XSTR( "Special Issue Anti-Cruiser Bomb Non-Conventional Warhead ", -1) $end_multi_text
