Difference between revisions of "User talk:Apollo"
From FreeSpace Wiki
Ktistai228 (talk | contribs) |
|||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
** Blasphemy? No. But I think we already had this talk regarding the Hydra. There are a lot of ships already, and adding retextures of canon ships is just a waste of time for those that wan't to browse around. Also to be noted, I have nothing against it being on the wiki. I have quite a lot against it being on the User-made Ships page. | ** Blasphemy? No. But I think we already had this talk regarding the Hydra. There are a lot of ships already, and adding retextures of canon ships is just a waste of time for those that wan't to browse around. Also to be noted, I have nothing against it being on the wiki. I have quite a lot against it being on the User-made Ships page. | ||
*I read that line, but since the Marauder was retabled, I didn't really think about it. - [[User:Apollo|Apollo]] 21:05, 13 May 2011 | *I read that line, but since the Marauder was retabled, I didn't really think about it. - [[User:Apollo|Apollo]] 21:05, 13 May 2011 | ||
| − | **Maybe we should continue the discussion about having an extra list for reskins. BTW, ktistai, please sign your posts with <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>, it makes your posts easier to identify and autogenerates the time stamp so it'll save you time, too. <br>@Apollo: I think the consensus last time this came up was that any reskins, even if they are retabled, weren't really "new ships" in and of themselves. I believe we decided they could have a Wiki page but weren't to be listed on the [[User-made Ships]] list (they can still be accessed from [[:Category:User-made Ships]]). We could reopen that discussion, I think it would be sensible to have a list of reskins as well, especially for "notable" ones like the reskins from Derelict. - [[User:Snail|Snail]] 08:57, 14 May 2011 | + | **Maybe we should continue the discussion about having an extra list for reskins. BTW, ktistai, please sign your posts with <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>, it makes your posts easier to identify and autogenerates the time stamp so it'll save you time, too. <br>@Apollo: I think the consensus last time this came up was that any reskins, even if they are retabled, weren't really "new ships" in and of themselves. I believe we decided they could have a Wiki page but weren't to be listed on the [[User-made Ships]] list (they can still be accessed from [[:Category:User-made Ships]]). We could reopen that discussion, I think it would be sensible to have a list of reskins as well, especially for "notable" ones like the reskins from Derelict. - [[User:Snail|Snail]] 08:57, 14 May 2011 |
| − | *Okay, sorry about that. - [[User:Apollo|Apollo]] 13:48, 14 May 2011 | + | *Okay, sorry about that. - [[User:Apollo|Apollo]] 13:48, 14 May 2011 |
**Don't worry, nobody's at fault. - [[User:Snail|Snail]] 13:52, 14 May 2011 (UTC) | **Don't worry, nobody's at fault. - [[User:Snail|Snail]] 13:52, 14 May 2011 (UTC) | ||
*Stay calm Apollo, it wasn't your fault. Snail, thanks for the [[User:Ktistai228|Ktistai228]] 19:43, 14 May 2011 (UTC) tip. About the reskin list, I do agree for canon ships, it would be a great idea. There is a whole lot for them, some people are searching for them, yet they aren't listed. It is a must do. For non-canon ships however, reskins can quite easily be incorporated in their respective Wiki pages. [[User:Ktistai228|Ktistai228]] 19:44, 14 May 2011 (UTC) | *Stay calm Apollo, it wasn't your fault. Snail, thanks for the [[User:Ktistai228|Ktistai228]] 19:43, 14 May 2011 (UTC) tip. About the reskin list, I do agree for canon ships, it would be a great idea. There is a whole lot for them, some people are searching for them, yet they aren't listed. It is a must do. For non-canon ships however, reskins can quite easily be incorporated in their respective Wiki pages. [[User:Ktistai228|Ktistai228]] 19:44, 14 May 2011 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Profanity == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Please note that the community decided to avoid profanity whenever possible on the Wiki, veteran comments and other opinion pieces included. Exaggerations ("piece of junk") are fine, but "piece of crap" is not, even if it's said in relation to the Osiris. Thanks. - [[User:TopAce|TopAce]] 07:05, 1 August 2012 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==comment edits== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Please comment all edits! [[User:General Battuta|General Battuta]] 22:49, 3 November 2012 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 23:29, 28 April 2013
This is for mods which are not meant as replacements for stock models. Meaning that, an HTL version of the GTFr Chronos does not belong here. Modified stock models on other hand may be acceptable. Ie the GTFr Aether is a Chronos with a pod attached and an extra turret. Also, that means no to retextures! - ktistai228, 10:15 PM GMT+2 12 may 2011
- Is this about the GTC Marauder? I don't think it's such a blasphemy to have one extra ship on this Wiki, even if it is just a simple reskin. Everybody has to start somewhere. - Snail 19:29, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
- Blasphemy? No. But I think we already had this talk regarding the Hydra. There are a lot of ships already, and adding retextures of canon ships is just a waste of time for those that wan't to browse around. Also to be noted, I have nothing against it being on the wiki. I have quite a lot against it being on the User-made Ships page.
- I read that line, but since the Marauder was retabled, I didn't really think about it. - Apollo 21:05, 13 May 2011
- Maybe we should continue the discussion about having an extra list for reskins. BTW, ktistai, please sign your posts with ~~~~, it makes your posts easier to identify and autogenerates the time stamp so it'll save you time, too.
@Apollo: I think the consensus last time this came up was that any reskins, even if they are retabled, weren't really "new ships" in and of themselves. I believe we decided they could have a Wiki page but weren't to be listed on the User-made Ships list (they can still be accessed from Category:User-made Ships). We could reopen that discussion, I think it would be sensible to have a list of reskins as well, especially for "notable" ones like the reskins from Derelict. - Snail 08:57, 14 May 2011
- Maybe we should continue the discussion about having an extra list for reskins. BTW, ktistai, please sign your posts with ~~~~, it makes your posts easier to identify and autogenerates the time stamp so it'll save you time, too.
- Okay, sorry about that. - Apollo 13:48, 14 May 2011
- Don't worry, nobody's at fault. - Snail 13:52, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
- Stay calm Apollo, it wasn't your fault. Snail, thanks for the Ktistai228 19:43, 14 May 2011 (UTC) tip. About the reskin list, I do agree for canon ships, it would be a great idea. There is a whole lot for them, some people are searching for them, yet they aren't listed. It is a must do. For non-canon ships however, reskins can quite easily be incorporated in their respective Wiki pages. Ktistai228 19:44, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
Profanity
Please note that the community decided to avoid profanity whenever possible on the Wiki, veteran comments and other opinion pieces included. Exaggerations ("piece of junk") are fine, but "piece of crap" is not, even if it's said in relation to the Osiris. Thanks. - TopAce 07:05, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
comment edits
Please comment all edits! General Battuta 22:49, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
