Difference between revisions of "Talk:Freespace 3 Wishlist"
From FreeSpace Wiki
m |
m |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Srsly, someone might mistake this as the FS3 wishlist of the entire community or something. Maybe a disclaimer at the top saying it's just the old VW denizens, or something would like that prevent it from happening? - [[User:Snail|Snail]] 11:37, 21 July 2009 (UTC) | Srsly, someone might mistake this as the FS3 wishlist of the entire community or something. Maybe a disclaimer at the top saying it's just the old VW denizens, or something would like that prevent it from happening? - [[User:Snail|Snail]] 11:37, 21 July 2009 (UTC) | ||
*Added an intro. What do you think of it? - [[User:TopAce|TopAce]] 12:35, 21 July 2009 (UTC) | *Added an intro. What do you think of it? - [[User:TopAce|TopAce]] 12:35, 21 July 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | **Yup, that's good IMO. Should we use a template and use it for the other VWatch article as well? "This was an article created by the Volition Watch team in <some date>. It does not convey the consensus among the community and represents only the views of the Volition Watch dudes. Please do not alter the contents of the article" or something like that. Perhaps with some funkeh graphics too. - [[User:Snail|Snail]] 22:13, 21 July 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | ***The "this does not convey the consensus of the community" disclaimer smacks of Mobius-ese to me. Specifying the author and the fact that it's an archived article should be sufficient, IMHO. - [[User:Goober5000|Goober5000]] 04:24, 22 July 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | ****I agree with Goober. It says more with less. - [[User:TopAce|TopAce]] 13:19, 22 July 2009 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 13:19, 22 July 2009
Srsly, someone might mistake this as the FS3 wishlist of the entire community or something. Maybe a disclaimer at the top saying it's just the old VW denizens, or something would like that prevent it from happening? - Snail 11:37, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
- Added an intro. What do you think of it? - TopAce 12:35, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
- Yup, that's good IMO. Should we use a template and use it for the other VWatch article as well? "This was an article created by the Volition Watch team in <some date>. It does not convey the consensus among the community and represents only the views of the Volition Watch dudes. Please do not alter the contents of the article" or something like that. Perhaps with some funkeh graphics too. - Snail 22:13, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
- The "this does not convey the consensus of the community" disclaimer smacks of Mobius-ese to me. Specifying the author and the fact that it's an archived article should be sufficient, IMHO. - Goober5000 04:24, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
- I agree with Goober. It says more with less. - TopAce 13:19, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
- The "this does not convey the consensus of the community" disclaimer smacks of Mobius-ese to me. Specifying the author and the fact that it's an archived article should be sufficient, IMHO. - Goober5000 04:24, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
- Yup, that's good IMO. Should we use a template and use it for the other VWatch article as well? "This was an article created by the Volition Watch team in <some date>. It does not convey the consensus among the community and represents only the views of the Volition Watch dudes. Please do not alter the contents of the article" or something like that. Perhaps with some funkeh graphics too. - Snail 22:13, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
