Difference between revisions of "SC 5"
(Container info added) |
Muninn Crow (talk | contribs) |
||
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
|} | |} | ||
+ | ==Modding Resources== | ||
+ | {{shipimage|image=[[Image:HTLSC5.png]]|caption=4.5.10 SFr SC5}} | ||
+ | '''Retail''':<br> | ||
+ | :$POF File: cargo05.pof<br> | ||
+ | :Textures: cargo05-01a, cargo05-02a, cargo05-01b, cargo05-02b, cargo05-01a, cargo05-02a<br> | ||
+ | '''MediaVP 4.5.10''':<br> | ||
+ | :$POF File: SC5.pof<br> | ||
+ | :Textures: SC5UV, MephDed, SC5Ded, damage<br> | ||
+ | Credits: Axem, mjn.mixael | ||
+ | |||
+ | [History]<br> | ||
+ | First WIP Post: Axem on Oct2, 2011<br> | ||
+ | First In-Game Model: mjn.mixael on Aug22, 2020<br> | ||
+ | Completed In-Game Model: ??? on ???<br> | ||
+ | Final Corrections: ??? on ???<br> | ||
[[Category:Ship]] | [[Category:Ship]] |
Latest revision as of 20:39, 9 October 2023
| ||||||||
|
SC 5 |
---|
The SC 5 is carried by SFr Mephisto.
Contents
Description:
FS1 Tech Room Description
We believe that the Shivans use cargo containers such as these as storage depots. We have yet to see a Shivan land on a planet. This leads us to believe that the Shivans plan on keeping all of their materials and resources in deep space.
FS2 Tech Room Description
The SC 5 class of Shivan cargo container is functionally identical to the SAC 3 class, as far as GTVA engineers have been able to determine. As with all Shivan cargo containers, standing orders are to capture at every opportunity, unless mission orders specifically dictate otherwise.
Developer Notes
N/A
Statistics
Hitpoints | 300 |
Length | 20 m |
Modding Resources
4.5.10 SFr SC5 |
---|
Retail:
- $POF File: cargo05.pof
- Textures: cargo05-01a, cargo05-02a, cargo05-01b, cargo05-02b, cargo05-01a, cargo05-02a
MediaVP 4.5.10:
- $POF File: SC5.pof
- Textures: SC5UV, MephDed, SC5Ded, damage
Credits: Axem, mjn.mixael
[History]
First WIP Post: Axem on Oct2, 2011
First In-Game Model: mjn.mixael on Aug22, 2020
Completed In-Game Model: ??? on ???
Final Corrections: ??? on ???