Difference between revisions of "User talk:AdmiralRalwood"

From FreeSpace Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
 
Line 6: Line 6:
  
 
::I was actually modeling it on a combination of [[Briefing Texts (FS2)]] and [[Briefing texts (Vassago's Dirge)]], since I wanted to see an example of another non-canon transcripts page. Both of them had the byline; I was just following suit. Feel free to remove them, though; I only included it specifically because I was copying that format. [[User:AdmiralRalwood|AdmiralRalwood]] 01:42, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
 
::I was actually modeling it on a combination of [[Briefing Texts (FS2)]] and [[Briefing texts (Vassago's Dirge)]], since I wanted to see an example of another non-canon transcripts page. Both of them had the byline; I was just following suit. Feel free to remove them, though; I only included it specifically because I was copying that format. [[User:AdmiralRalwood|AdmiralRalwood]] 01:42, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
 +
 +
::Yeah, I see. That format looks like legacy from old data that was copy-pasted in directly from  an older resource - it really should be standardized to the Wiki look rather than the wiki standardizing back to the old format. Not that you could have been expected to know that, of course. I'll have a look at all of the existing ones and wikify them. [[User:Black Wolf|Black Wolf]] 02:29, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 02:29, 29 January 2014

Hey Admiral Ralwood,

There's no need to sign your name on the pages you generate - the wiki records who creates the page and how much work is done by each individual, and putting bylines everywhere is kind of against the collaborative spirit if the wiki (not to mention a little untidy). Thanks for contributing though - everything else looks fine. Black Wolf 07:11, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

I was actually modeling it on a combination of Briefing Texts (FS2) and Briefing texts (Vassago's Dirge), since I wanted to see an example of another non-canon transcripts page. Both of them had the byline; I was just following suit. Feel free to remove them, though; I only included it specifically because I was copying that format. AdmiralRalwood 01:42, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
Yeah, I see. That format looks like legacy from old data that was copy-pasted in directly from an older resource - it really should be standardized to the Wiki look rather than the wiki standardizing back to the old format. Not that you could have been expected to know that, of course. I'll have a look at all of the existing ones and wikify them. Black Wolf 02:29, 29 January 2014 (UTC)