Difference between revisions of "Talk:GTF Erinyes"
From FreeSpace Wiki
m (opinion....) |
m |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
: Possibly because it seems to be wrong.. [[GTF Erinyes]] has 2 x 4 primary weapon banks while [[GTF Myrmidon]] has 'only' 1 x 4 & 1 x 2. Erinyes also has greater secondary banks (40 & 50 = 90) than Myrmidon (20 & 20 & 40 = 80)... So Erinyes is IMHO superior in terms of pure firepower. - [[User:Wanderer|Wanderer]] 13:45, 8 May 2006 (BST) | : Possibly because it seems to be wrong.. [[GTF Erinyes]] has 2 x 4 primary weapon banks while [[GTF Myrmidon]] has 'only' 1 x 4 & 1 x 2. Erinyes also has greater secondary banks (40 & 50 = 90) than Myrmidon (20 & 20 & 40 = 80)... So Erinyes is IMHO superior in terms of pure firepower. - [[User:Wanderer|Wanderer]] 13:45, 8 May 2006 (BST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Oh... I was talking about primary firepower and was drawing that from a [http://www.hard-light.net/forums/index.php/topic,38526.0.html thread] and I thought the conclusion was that firing two banks at once doubled the wait time, thus cancelling out firing 2 banks of four and making it equivalent to one bank of four. Upon further investigation, it looks like I was wrong, and they decided otherwise when I wasn't paying attention. | ||
| + | |||
| + | --[[User:Moniter|Mars]] 00:05, 9 May 2006 (BST) | ||
Latest revision as of 23:05, 8 May 2006
Deleted Veteren Comments
I'm assuming there was a reson for the deletion of:
Theoretically the Erinyes doesn't have any more firepower than the Myrmidon but its armor, missile banks, and the ability to carry Harpoons make it tactically superior.
--Mars 12:32, 8 May 2006 (BST)
- Possibly because it seems to be wrong.. GTF Erinyes has 2 x 4 primary weapon banks while GTF Myrmidon has 'only' 1 x 4 & 1 x 2. Erinyes also has greater secondary banks (40 & 50 = 90) than Myrmidon (20 & 20 & 40 = 80)... So Erinyes is IMHO superior in terms of pure firepower. - Wanderer 13:45, 8 May 2006 (BST)
Oh... I was talking about primary firepower and was drawing that from a thread and I thought the conclusion was that firing two banks at once doubled the wait time, thus cancelling out firing 2 banks of four and making it equivalent to one bank of four. Upon further investigation, it looks like I was wrong, and they decided otherwise when I wasn't paying attention.
--Mars 00:05, 9 May 2006 (BST)
