Difference between revisions of "Talk:GTM Cyclops"
From FreeSpace Wiki
FlamingCobra (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:::There is no canon information to suggest this. Unless this has some relevance to the Wiki coverage of this topic, this discussion probably belongs on the forum. - [[User:Snail|Snail]] 22:15, 7 July 2011 (UTC) | :::There is no canon information to suggest this. Unless this has some relevance to the Wiki coverage of this topic, this discussion probably belongs on the forum. - [[User:Snail|Snail]] 22:15, 7 July 2011 (UTC) | ||
::::Qent, the word "non-conventional" is not even in the article. Where did you get that? | ::::Qent, the word "non-conventional" is not even in the article. Where did you get that? | ||
| + | ::::: The description in the Weapon Selection screen (Retail only; MVPs change it to be more informative). [[User:Qent|Qent]] 07:23, 8 July 2011 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 07:23, 8 July 2011
So, what kind of warhead does it use? Antimatter? Fission? Fusion? Fission and Fusion? Matter-antimatter annihilation? --FlamingCobra 19:26, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
- "Non-conventional" could be any of those, and it could even vary among different versions of the Cyclops. I think that's as far as canon will get you. Qent 20:01, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
- "Could it be a weapon that disrupts subatomic particles at the quark level? --FlamingCobra 21:31, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
- There is no canon information to suggest this. Unless this has some relevance to the Wiki coverage of this topic, this discussion probably belongs on the forum. - Snail 22:15, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
- Qent, the word "non-conventional" is not even in the article. Where did you get that?
- The description in the Weapon Selection screen (Retail only; MVPs change it to be more informative). Qent 07:23, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
- Qent, the word "non-conventional" is not even in the article. Where did you get that?
- There is no canon information to suggest this. Unless this has some relevance to the Wiki coverage of this topic, this discussion probably belongs on the forum. - Snail 22:15, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
- "Could it be a weapon that disrupts subatomic particles at the quark level? --FlamingCobra 21:31, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
