Difference between revisions of "Talk:Colossus manufacturers"
SpaceFreak (talk | contribs) (What mjn said.) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
When I went through and made all the company logos, I worked with multiple people on IRC looking at the list of corporations/logos from the Colossus cutscene. We quickly realized that almost all of them were last names of Volition employees and thus we quickly figured out what the company names were supposed to be, despite the pixelated image. We finished the job and are much more sure of these names than the others that were previously listed. Additionally, there is a cbanim that uses the exact same corporation logo list as the cutscene which helped to clarify the corporation names. - MjnMixael | When I went through and made all the company logos, I worked with multiple people on IRC looking at the list of corporations/logos from the Colossus cutscene. We quickly realized that almost all of them were last names of Volition employees and thus we quickly figured out what the company names were supposed to be, despite the pixelated image. We finished the job and are much more sure of these names than the others that were previously listed. Additionally, there is a cbanim that uses the exact same corporation logo list as the cutscene which helped to clarify the corporation names. - MjnMixael | ||
| − | =Redundancy?= | + | ==Redundancy?== |
Also, it turns out this list is basically every 'canon' corporation we know of and is probably a moot list to keep around separate from the main Corporation page. I'd probably just delete this page alltogether. - MjnMixael | Also, it turns out this list is basically every 'canon' corporation we know of and is probably a moot list to keep around separate from the main Corporation page. I'd probably just delete this page alltogether. - MjnMixael | ||
True, there doesn't seem to be any notable company missing from the constructor list. In fact, both pages list 31 corporations... Haven't checked if all of them match, but this seems redundant indeed. [[User:SpaceFreak|SpaceFreak]] 17:38, 22 January 2013 (UTC) | True, there doesn't seem to be any notable company missing from the constructor list. In fact, both pages list 31 corporations... Haven't checked if all of them match, but this seems redundant indeed. [[User:SpaceFreak|SpaceFreak]] 17:38, 22 January 2013 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I have checked it. The listed corporations match perfectly on the two pages. I'll add a note to the Corporations page stating that all those corporations are listed as Colossus manufacturers. Also I'll wait for a couple of days before deleting the article in case somebody has objections. (unlikely) - [[User:TopAce|TopAce]] 18:05, 22 January 2013 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 18:05, 22 January 2013
When I went through and made all the company logos, I worked with multiple people on IRC looking at the list of corporations/logos from the Colossus cutscene. We quickly realized that almost all of them were last names of Volition employees and thus we quickly figured out what the company names were supposed to be, despite the pixelated image. We finished the job and are much more sure of these names than the others that were previously listed. Additionally, there is a cbanim that uses the exact same corporation logo list as the cutscene which helped to clarify the corporation names. - MjnMixael
Redundancy?
Also, it turns out this list is basically every 'canon' corporation we know of and is probably a moot list to keep around separate from the main Corporation page. I'd probably just delete this page alltogether. - MjnMixael
True, there doesn't seem to be any notable company missing from the constructor list. In fact, both pages list 31 corporations... Haven't checked if all of them match, but this seems redundant indeed. SpaceFreak 17:38, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
I have checked it. The listed corporations match perfectly on the two pages. I'll add a note to the Corporations page stating that all those corporations are listed as Colossus manufacturers. Also I'll wait for a couple of days before deleting the article in case somebody has objections. (unlikely) - TopAce 18:05, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
