Talk:Narwhal's Campaign List

Necessity of a Chronological List

User-made campaigns do not take place in the same continuity; they occur in separate time-lines and, in my opinion, cannot be placed in a single 'chronological' list such as this. - Snail 08:36, 3 August 2008 (CDT)

It's a commendable attempt. I would like to see how it would turn out. - TopAce 10:20, 3 August 2008 (CDT)

Well, it's another way of sorting the campaign list, no less arbitrary than alphabetically. I think a better way to do it might be to make the main campaign list into a sortable table, rather like this example, but barring that, I've got no problem with the extra page(s). -- BlueFlames 14:59, 3 August 2008 (CDT)

The exemple you showed is pretty good, BlueFlames. I believe that's the next step (Name/How finished is the campaign/Author/Mod ?/Side played/Date). - Narwhal

We've already got them in something resembling loose chronological order, so it's a bit late to object to them on those grounds. Ngtm1r 08:20, 4 August 2008 (CDT)

Chronological Placement of Campaigns

Okay, I've moved Artifice to the Post-Capella section of the list at least twice now, and I'm wondering why it keeps getting moved back to the Capella era.... It takes place in late 2369, two full years after the destruction of Capella, and the campaign is most certainly not an anti-shivan mop-up operation. -- BlueFlames 14:15, 13 August 2008 (CDT)

Probably my mistake when I put back a chronological order for Capella / Post Capella. The first time it was intentional (wanted to group the campaign that are "together", this time wasn't. -- Narval