Difference between revisions of "Talk:GTM Cyclops"

From FreeSpace Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m (sure why not)
Line 3: Line 3:
 
::"Could it be a weapon that disrupts subatomic particles at the quark level? --[[User:FlamingCobra|FlamingCobra]] 21:31, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
 
::"Could it be a weapon that disrupts subatomic particles at the quark level? --[[User:FlamingCobra|FlamingCobra]] 21:31, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
 
:::There is no canon information to suggest this. Unless this has some relevance to the Wiki coverage of this topic, this discussion probably belongs on the forum. - [[User:Snail|Snail]] 22:15, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
 
:::There is no canon information to suggest this. Unless this has some relevance to the Wiki coverage of this topic, this discussion probably belongs on the forum. - [[User:Snail|Snail]] 22:15, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
 +
::::Qent, the word "non-conventional" is not even in the article.  Where did you get that?

Revision as of 01:18, 8 July 2011

So, what kind of warhead does it use? Antimatter? Fission? Fusion? Fission and Fusion? Matter-antimatter annihilation? --FlamingCobra 19:26, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

"Non-conventional" could be any of those, and it could even vary among different versions of the Cyclops. I think that's as far as canon will get you. Qent 20:01, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
"Could it be a weapon that disrupts subatomic particles at the quark level? --FlamingCobra 21:31, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
There is no canon information to suggest this. Unless this has some relevance to the Wiki coverage of this topic, this discussion probably belongs on the forum. - Snail 22:15, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
Qent, the word "non-conventional" is not even in the article. Where did you get that?