Difference between revisions of "GTD Henderson"
From FreeSpace Wiki
Black Wolf (talk | contribs) m (Gallery) |
MatthTheGeek (talk | contribs) (nupix + dev notes) |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
− | {{shipimage|image=[[Image: | + | {{shipimage|image=[[Image:GTDHenderson.png|750px]]|caption=GTD Henderson}} |
==Description:== | ==Description:== | ||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
*Model by '''aldo''' | *Model by '''aldo''' | ||
*Texturing, converting by '''FSF''' | *Texturing, converting by '''FSF''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ===Developer Notes=== | ||
+ | About 1500 metres long, battleship, 14 turrets, no fighterbay. Related to the Orion. Tabled as a roughly FS1-era ship. | ||
+ | About halfway through the texturing, I realised that this is actually not Terran-shaped at all. That's why it may look "unfinished" in some places, I was fed up with it. | ||
+ | Still, I tried to make sure everything works properly. It was mainly a converting exercise anyway. | ||
+ | -FSF | ||
Latest revision as of 21:24, 29 January 2013
All information related to the GTD Henderson is non-canon. |
---|
Back to User-made Ships |
GTD Henderson |
---|
Contents
Description:
Tech Room Description
None
Credits
- Model by aldo
- Texturing, converting by FSF
Developer Notes
About 1500 metres long, battleship, 14 turrets, no fighterbay. Related to the Orion. Tabled as a roughly FS1-era ship. About halfway through the texturing, I realised that this is actually not Terran-shaped at all. That's why it may look "unfinished" in some places, I was fed up with it. Still, I tried to make sure everything works properly. It was mainly a converting exercise anyway. -FSF
Performance:
Statistics
Type | Destroyer |
Manufacturer | Unknown |
Maneuverability | N/A |
Max Velocity | 15 |
Max Afterburner Velocity | N/A |
Armor | N/A |
Hitpoints | 100 000 |
Shields | N/A |
Width | 341 m |
Height | 247 m |
Length | 1491 m |
Armaments
Default Statistics | |
Turret Type | Amount |
Terran Huge Turret | 6 (x3) |
Terran Turret | 8 |
Gallery
The GTD Goliath in the Deneb system.
Veteran Comments