Difference between revisions of "Talk:Battle of Endor Syndrome"
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
Article moved. - TopAce | Article moved. - TopAce | ||
| − | I question the validity of this article in this day and age. I can cite several campaigns that have had well-executed Endor-esque situations off the top of my head. If the mission fell apart it was for other reasons. I'll agree it's not for the novice FREDder, but unless and until you can properly execute a large mission, you haven't really earned your spurs.-ngtm1r | + | I question the validity of this article in this day and age; most of the anti-BOE resources cite FS1 limitations. I can cite several campaigns that have had well-executed Endor-esque situations off the top of my head. If the mission fell apart it was for other reasons. I'll agree it's not for the novice FREDder, but unless and until you can properly execute a large mission, you haven't really earned your spurs.-ngtm1r |
Revision as of 17:51, 14 December 2006
"Scheme" isn't really an appropriate wording for this subject - Black Wolf
What about "Disease"? Figuratively, I mean - TopAce
It's traditionally been called "Battle of Endor Syndrome" AFAIK. - Black Wolf
I did not want to use that title, I wanted a new one. - TopAce
Why? - Black Wolf
Only to differenciate the two articles. - TopAce
Article moved. - TopAce
I question the validity of this article in this day and age; most of the anti-BOE resources cite FS1 limitations. I can cite several campaigns that have had well-executed Endor-esque situations off the top of my head. If the mission fell apart it was for other reasons. I'll agree it's not for the novice FREDder, but unless and until you can properly execute a large mission, you haven't really earned your spurs.-ngtm1r
