Difference between revisions of "Talk:Identity of the Nebula System"
From FreeSpace Wiki
Goober5000 (talk | contribs) (New page: It is not encyclopedic to corrupt the use/mention distinction, imply part of a monologue is the whole monologue, or remove a link to an article (however small) on GalacticEmperor. It is c...) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
It is not encyclopedic to corrupt the use/mention distinction, imply part of a monologue is the whole monologue, or remove a link to an article (however small) on GalacticEmperor. It is certainly not encyclopedic to misquote Wikipedia's article on the Crab Nebula. These are not my opinions; these are standards that should be adhered to. The only part of your edits that might be justifiable are your phrases "HLP member" and "another fan", but those are understood from the context and are therefore superfluous. [[User:Goober5000|Goober5000]] 16:34, 17 May 2007 (CDT) | It is not encyclopedic to corrupt the use/mention distinction, imply part of a monologue is the whole monologue, or remove a link to an article (however small) on GalacticEmperor. It is certainly not encyclopedic to misquote Wikipedia's article on the Crab Nebula. These are not my opinions; these are standards that should be adhered to. The only part of your edits that might be justifiable are your phrases "HLP member" and "another fan", but those are understood from the context and are therefore superfluous. [[User:Goober5000|Goober5000]] 16:34, 17 May 2007 (CDT) | ||
| + | *Wikipedia's articles are changed over time, so every time someone changes those phrases, will you change the sentences here just for that? GalacticEmperor may be a very good member of the community, but I don't think he deserves a separate article on a wiki, unless it's his user page, of course. And if it is, linking there might be justifiable. And it is certainly not encyclopedic not to mention fan's names with adding a "fan" or whatever to clarify that we are not talking about a Volition staffer. - [[User:TopAce|TopAce]] 16:47, 17 May 2007 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 21:47, 17 May 2007
It is not encyclopedic to corrupt the use/mention distinction, imply part of a monologue is the whole monologue, or remove a link to an article (however small) on GalacticEmperor. It is certainly not encyclopedic to misquote Wikipedia's article on the Crab Nebula. These are not my opinions; these are standards that should be adhered to. The only part of your edits that might be justifiable are your phrases "HLP member" and "another fan", but those are understood from the context and are therefore superfluous. Goober5000 16:34, 17 May 2007 (CDT)
- Wikipedia's articles are changed over time, so every time someone changes those phrases, will you change the sentences here just for that? GalacticEmperor may be a very good member of the community, but I don't think he deserves a separate article on a wiki, unless it's his user page, of course. And if it is, linking there might be justifiable. And it is certainly not encyclopedic not to mention fan's names with adding a "fan" or whatever to clarify that we are not talking about a Volition staffer. - TopAce 16:47, 17 May 2007 (CDT)
