Talk:Silent Threat: Reborn

Ahem, G5K. My edits weren't "random". In fact, I now see you've reverted back to erroneous capitalization in the various lists in the article. But, seeing as this is your baby, I will not mind. I simply thought it'd be both a) better for the article to have it correctly capitalized, and 2) a fun and friendly poke at your (at times perhaps a bit self-indulgent) "grammar nazi" custom. ;) I mean this w/out any vitriol and that, in any shape or form. Oi, btw; "tba" is an acronym for "to be announced". I just thought you'd like to know. --Selectah 00:26, 13 December 2006 (CST)

• Oh, btw 2; I also see that you've re-inserted the "superior to" thingie. I thought judgement calls had no place in an encyclopedia. Doesn't that kinda stuff really belong on a project website? Like "this is the best campaign in the known universe" and that? According to whom? With what authority? How can these people know what others will think of it? Using what technique? How? And that. --Selectah 00:33, 13 December 2006 (CST)

• I see the article still sports erroneous capitalization, weasel words and unprofessional language. I know it's bollox'd, but if I correct it, I have a nagging suspicion G5K is going to storm in with his Hammer of Unreciprocity (+2 damage) and revert everything back to what he thinks is correct. So I guess I won't mind, then. Whaddya say, fellow HLP'ians? Should I just drop it? --Selectah 10:16, 20 December 2006 (CST)

I'm kinda curious as to what the hell you're on about Selectah, since I find none of what you state. And frankly, the "superior to" is the guiding concept of the campaign: rebuild Silent Threat, make it better. It is not judgement of the campaign's actual superiority but rather what it seeks to achieve. And frankly for your protestations of needed impartiality, you're not showing much, so I have to question your fitness to judge the requirement. --ngtm1r 12:00 December 21 2006 (PST)