Difference between revisions of "Talk:*.OGG"
From FreeSpace Wiki
Goober5000 (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The revert IMO seems wrong. OGG is a container, not a audio codec. I'll have a think about how to phrase this better than I did before. [[User:Bruce89|Bruce89]] 13:01, 9 September 2007 (CDT) | The revert IMO seems wrong. OGG is a container, not a audio codec. I'll have a think about how to phrase this better than I did before. [[User:Bruce89|Bruce89]] 13:01, 9 September 2007 (CDT) | ||
:The revert isn't wrong. Note that the previous version said OGG is for "compressed multimedia files", not "compressed audio files". "Multimedia" includes both audio and video. Also, I think it's sufficient for the page to say that Vorbis is for audio and Theora is for video; the additional information is worded kind of confusingly and is probably too technical anyway. [[User:Goober5000|Goober5000]] 13:52, 9 September 2007 (CDT) | :The revert isn't wrong. Note that the previous version said OGG is for "compressed multimedia files", not "compressed audio files". "Multimedia" includes both audio and video. Also, I think it's sufficient for the page to say that Vorbis is for audio and Theora is for video; the additional information is worded kind of confusingly and is probably too technical anyway. [[User:Goober5000|Goober5000]] 13:52, 9 September 2007 (CDT) | ||
| + | :: I rewrote my edit, that is what the second edit by me was. Please do not revert it again before reading it. [[User:Bruce89|Bruce89]] 15:18, 9 September 2007 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 20:18, 9 September 2007
The revert IMO seems wrong. OGG is a container, not a audio codec. I'll have a think about how to phrase this better than I did before. Bruce89 13:01, 9 September 2007 (CDT)
- The revert isn't wrong. Note that the previous version said OGG is for "compressed multimedia files", not "compressed audio files". "Multimedia" includes both audio and video. Also, I think it's sufficient for the page to say that Vorbis is for audio and Theora is for video; the additional information is worded kind of confusingly and is probably too technical anyway. Goober5000 13:52, 9 September 2007 (CDT)
- I rewrote my edit, that is what the second edit by me was. Please do not revert it again before reading it. Bruce89 15:18, 9 September 2007 (CDT)
