Difference between revisions of "Talk:Veteran Comments policy"
m |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Everything's about the writing style, it should be the way more serious. It can be changed without deleting everything, the style might not be ok but the opinions remain valid. - [[User:Mobius|Mobius]] 03:29, 2 March 2008 (CST) | Everything's about the writing style, it should be the way more serious. It can be changed without deleting everything, the style might not be ok but the opinions remain valid. - [[User:Mobius|Mobius]] 03:29, 2 March 2008 (CST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Sorry, you won't find many volunteers there. It's good that you take FreeSpace Wiki so seriously; not everyone does. I think that the Wiki forum would be a better way to be heard on this issue. [[User:Mustang19|Mustang19]] 03:39, 2 March 2008 (CST) | ||
Revision as of 09:39, 2 March 2008
I really have to agree, some of the comments to comefrom blogs. What is going to happen to "unconventional" comments? Will they be deleted or changed? - Mobius
That's the plan, purge them all. Feel free to delete or modify any comment that you think doesn't deserve to be there. Mustang19 03:19, 2 March 2008 (CST)
Everything's about the writing style, it should be the way more serious. It can be changed without deleting everything, the style might not be ok but the opinions remain valid. - Mobius 03:29, 2 March 2008 (CST)
Sorry, you won't find many volunteers there. It's good that you take FreeSpace Wiki so seriously; not everyone does. I think that the Wiki forum would be a better way to be heard on this issue. Mustang19 03:39, 2 March 2008 (CST)
