Difference between revisions of "Talk:Mintaka"
From FreeSpace Wiki
| (4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Is this star even canon? I can't find it on any starmaps. Additionally, ITAMaster just added that it links to Vasuda and Ross 128, which it doesn't. I recommend removal. - [[User:Snail|Snail]] 07:53, 6 July 2008 (CDT) | Is this star even canon? I can't find it on any starmaps. Additionally, ITAMaster just added that it links to Vasuda and Ross 128, which it doesn't. I recommend removal. - [[User:Snail|Snail]] 07:53, 6 July 2008 (CDT) | ||
*I remember the name, I just don't know when and where I saw it. Perhaps it's a noncanon expanded nodemap based on a mod. [http://home.arcor.de/gs-ds/Storys/da_nodemap.png Voila]. I used a nodemap that somewhat looks like this while developing ITHOV. Well, Mintaka did appear, it's just not in canon FS. - [[User:TopAce|TopAce]] 12:22, 6 July 2008 (CDT) | *I remember the name, I just don't know when and where I saw it. Perhaps it's a noncanon expanded nodemap based on a mod. [http://home.arcor.de/gs-ds/Storys/da_nodemap.png Voila]. I used a nodemap that somewhat looks like this while developing ITHOV. Well, Mintaka did appear, it's just not in canon FS. - [[User:TopAce|TopAce]] 12:22, 6 July 2008 (CDT) | ||
| + | **Yeah, non-canon star, but has appeared in some campaigns so it's allowed. Needs the non-canon warning though, which I'm adding right now, and of course these non-canon jump nodes can't be added to articles for canon stars. - [[User:Shade|Shade]] 16:50, 6 July 2008 (CDT) | ||
| + | ***Erm ITAMaster put Mintaka linking to Vasuda and Ross 128, while the BWO one is different. What do we do? I think the more commonly accepted fanon should supersede fanon which nobody has even seen. | ||
| + | ****Fanon is fanon. Still, you do have a point in that different fanons may clash on these things. I'm thinking split the contested info up by mod/campaign within the article so people can see what applies where. Added that to the article to show what I mean. - [[User:Shade|Shade]] 15:57, 7 July 2008 (CDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 20:57, 7 July 2008
Is this star even canon? I can't find it on any starmaps. Additionally, ITAMaster just added that it links to Vasuda and Ross 128, which it doesn't. I recommend removal. - Snail 07:53, 6 July 2008 (CDT)
- I remember the name, I just don't know when and where I saw it. Perhaps it's a noncanon expanded nodemap based on a mod. Voila. I used a nodemap that somewhat looks like this while developing ITHOV. Well, Mintaka did appear, it's just not in canon FS. - TopAce 12:22, 6 July 2008 (CDT)
- Yeah, non-canon star, but has appeared in some campaigns so it's allowed. Needs the non-canon warning though, which I'm adding right now, and of course these non-canon jump nodes can't be added to articles for canon stars. - Shade 16:50, 6 July 2008 (CDT)
- Erm ITAMaster put Mintaka linking to Vasuda and Ross 128, while the BWO one is different. What do we do? I think the more commonly accepted fanon should supersede fanon which nobody has even seen.
- Fanon is fanon. Still, you do have a point in that different fanons may clash on these things. I'm thinking split the contested info up by mod/campaign within the article so people can see what applies where. Added that to the article to show what I mean. - Shade 15:57, 7 July 2008 (CDT)
- Erm ITAMaster put Mintaka linking to Vasuda and Ross 128, while the BWO one is different. What do we do? I think the more commonly accepted fanon should supersede fanon which nobody has even seen.
- Yeah, non-canon star, but has appeared in some campaigns so it's allowed. Needs the non-canon warning though, which I'm adding right now, and of course these non-canon jump nodes can't be added to articles for canon stars. - Shade 16:50, 6 July 2008 (CDT)
