Difference between revisions of "Talk:Mystery of the Trinity"
From FreeSpace Wiki
m (→About the Notes: Oops...) |
m (→About the Notes) |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
:Nah, your argument's fine. I'll cut the cheating tips. Will that do? -- [[User:Androgeos Exeunt|Androgeos Exeunt]] 01:38, 21 September 2008 (CDT) | :Nah, your argument's fine. I'll cut the cheating tips. Will that do? -- [[User:Androgeos Exeunt|Androgeos Exeunt]] 01:38, 21 September 2008 (CDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Nice, I thought I was the only contributor with that opinion. - [[User:Mobius|Mobius] | ||
Revision as of 17:13, 21 September 2008
Beatable?
It's been a while since I played but I recall playing on easy difficulty and specifically looking at the mission log and seeing that the Trinity had actually Self-destructed rather than being taken down by one of the Dragons. Is there actual video evidence of this feat? --Forgottenlord 14:58, 14 June 2007 (CDT)
- The Dragons or Basilisks attack the Trinity and eventually destroy it with a few shots. Self-destruct isn't always needed. - Mobius
About the Notes
I'm sorry to say this but I don't think there should be exaggerated references to cheating in the Wiki. It's meant to provide info in an intelligent way, what's the point in encouraging the use of cheats? Suggesting an easy way too boost the killboard with cheats is a very bad thing, IMO. - Mobius
- Nah, your argument's fine. I'll cut the cheating tips. Will that do? -- Androgeos Exeunt 01:38, 21 September 2008 (CDT)
- Nice, I thought I was the only contributor with that opinion. - [[User:Mobius|Mobius]
