Difference between revisions of "Talk:Galactic Terran Alliance"
From FreeSpace Wiki
(no nm should have trusted Snail) |
|||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Parts of this article are not only non-canon, but ''contradictory'' to canon. Would anybody mind if I nuked this article and rewrote it? - [[User:Snail|Snail]] 18:35, 17 July 2008 (CDT) | Parts of this article are not only non-canon, but ''contradictory'' to canon. Would anybody mind if I nuked this article and rewrote it? - [[User:Snail|Snail]] 18:35, 17 July 2008 (CDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | *I revised the article and found the following: Only the "Origins" section looks non-canon to me. Others are canon, maybe the bit about the "There was no initial military conflict" isn't. (I don't remember such a thing). If there are contradictions between the article and canon, point them out. Other than that, the article is okay. Still needs the GTA logo and perhaps some more details about the organization itself. <br> Something else: Some articles are referenced too many times in the article, like [[Shivans]] and [[Vasudans]]. I removed most of the links because I cannot find an apparent reason for linking to the [[Shivans]] page every time the species' name is mentioned. Distracting, in my opinion. - [[User:TopAce|TopAce]] 06:58, 18 July 2008 (CDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | **I'm still not satisfied with how non-canon'd this thing is, especially given how an important faction this is in the FS universe. It's chock full of contradictory to canon statements and just doesn't seem right that someone's guesswork should be able to go straight onto this thing like this. - [[User:Snail|Snail]] 09:11, 20 June 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | ***That template refers to the Origins section. It doesn't say much anyway, so let's get rid of it. The other sections are all right to my eyes. - [[User:TopAce|TopAce]] 15:54, 20 June 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | What the fuck is going on with this article? Much of it seems to have been made up from whole cloth. I can't find canon reference for a lot of this. [[User:General Battuta|General Battuta]] 00:20, 14 February 2014 (UTC) | ||
| + | *I take it back, this is more solid than I thought! [[User:General Battuta|General Battuta]] 00:34, 14 February 2014 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 00:34, 14 February 2014
Where's the GTA insignia?
Parts of this article are not only non-canon, but contradictory to canon. Would anybody mind if I nuked this article and rewrote it? - Snail 18:35, 17 July 2008 (CDT)
- I revised the article and found the following: Only the "Origins" section looks non-canon to me. Others are canon, maybe the bit about the "There was no initial military conflict" isn't. (I don't remember such a thing). If there are contradictions between the article and canon, point them out. Other than that, the article is okay. Still needs the GTA logo and perhaps some more details about the organization itself.
Something else: Some articles are referenced too many times in the article, like Shivans and Vasudans. I removed most of the links because I cannot find an apparent reason for linking to the Shivans page every time the species' name is mentioned. Distracting, in my opinion. - TopAce 06:58, 18 July 2008 (CDT)
- I'm still not satisfied with how non-canon'd this thing is, especially given how an important faction this is in the FS universe. It's chock full of contradictory to canon statements and just doesn't seem right that someone's guesswork should be able to go straight onto this thing like this. - Snail 09:11, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
- That template refers to the Origins section. It doesn't say much anyway, so let's get rid of it. The other sections are all right to my eyes. - TopAce 15:54, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
- I'm still not satisfied with how non-canon'd this thing is, especially given how an important faction this is in the FS universe. It's chock full of contradictory to canon statements and just doesn't seem right that someone's guesswork should be able to go straight onto this thing like this. - Snail 09:11, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
What the fuck is going on with this article? Much of it seems to have been made up from whole cloth. I can't find canon reference for a lot of this. General Battuta 00:20, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
- I take it back, this is more solid than I thought! General Battuta 00:34, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
