Difference between revisions of "Talk:Ricochet Effect"
From FreeSpace Wiki
(New page: =="Non-canon" template== Is that template necessary? There should be a new INF template very soon. --- Mobius) |
m |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
=="Non-canon" template== | =="Non-canon" template== | ||
Is that template necessary? There should be a new INF template very soon. --- [[User:Mobius|Mobius]] | Is that template necessary? There should be a new INF template very soon. --- [[User:Mobius|Mobius]] | ||
| + | *Yes, it is necessary until a new Inferno template gets inserted into the article. - [[User:TopAce|TopAce]] 21:11, 25 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | **Isn't that a bit unconvenient? We'll then have to remove the template on all articles that will be created in the future. I suggest to create a generic Inferno template ASAP so that we won't have any problems. --- [[User:Mobius|Mobius]] | ||
| + | ***That template is not permanent. We need some template to indicate the article's non-canon state in a certain way. If someone accesses this article one millisecond after you have removed the non-canon template, he'll think that the Ricochet Effect is canon. I don't see the problem with future articles, though. Feel free to go ahead and create a generic Inferno template that makes it '''explicit''' that Inferno is non-canon. That's when the generic non-canon template becomes inconvenient for Inferno-related articles. - [[User:TopAce|TopAce]] 21:50, 25 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 21:50, 25 March 2009
"Non-canon" template
Is that template necessary? There should be a new INF template very soon. --- Mobius
- Yes, it is necessary until a new Inferno template gets inserted into the article. - TopAce 21:11, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
- Isn't that a bit unconvenient? We'll then have to remove the template on all articles that will be created in the future. I suggest to create a generic Inferno template ASAP so that we won't have any problems. --- Mobius
- That template is not permanent. We need some template to indicate the article's non-canon state in a certain way. If someone accesses this article one millisecond after you have removed the non-canon template, he'll think that the Ricochet Effect is canon. I don't see the problem with future articles, though. Feel free to go ahead and create a generic Inferno template that makes it explicit that Inferno is non-canon. That's when the generic non-canon template becomes inconvenient for Inferno-related articles. - TopAce 21:50, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
- Isn't that a bit unconvenient? We'll then have to remove the template on all articles that will be created in the future. I suggest to create a generic Inferno template ASAP so that we won't have any problems. --- Mobius
