Difference between revisions of "Talk:Retail SEXP Reference"
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
<br><br> | <br><br> | ||
Like these: [[Less-than|<]], [[Greater-than|>]]? And the underscore is imho not a real issue as it is applied to all links in similar manner... [[User:Wanderer|Wanderer]] 20:16, 14 Apr 2006 (BST) | Like these: [[Less-than|<]], [[Greater-than|>]]? And the underscore is imho not a real issue as it is applied to all links in similar manner... [[User:Wanderer|Wanderer]] 20:16, 14 Apr 2006 (BST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Ah, that's how to do it. And yeah, can live with the underscore as long as it's there for everything I guess. I'll put those in instead and get rid of the disclaimer. Same for the SCP sexp page, which also has it. [[User:Shade|Shade]] 21:20, 14 Apr 2006 (CET) | ||
Latest revision as of 19:20, 14 April 2006
I just noticed this... Certain sexp names are off due to mediawiki limitations. Which ones or rather what kind of names? Wanderer 19:13, 14 Apr 2006 (BST)
Equal, greater-than, less-than, plus, minus, multiply, divide. They basically look wrong due to the link underscore or, for greater/less-than, can't display at all since there's no code for those two particular characters - at least none listed in the help, anyway. If they can be made to display correctly so we can ditch that disclaimer, that's definitely the better option. Shade 20:57, 14 Apr 2006 (CET)
Like these: <, >? And the underscore is imho not a real issue as it is applied to all links in similar manner... Wanderer 20:16, 14 Apr 2006 (BST)
Ah, that's how to do it. And yeah, can live with the underscore as long as it's there for everything I guess. I'll put those in instead and get rid of the disclaimer. Same for the SCP sexp page, which also has it. Shade 21:20, 14 Apr 2006 (CET)
