Difference between revisions of "Talk:Blue Planet: Chanticleer"

From FreeSpace Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "===I assume this is not BP canon, right?=== First of all, congratulations on this release. It's always a good thing when fans come out with new content for everyone to enjoy....")
 
m (I assume this is not BP canon, right?)
 
(4 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
===I assume this is not BP canon, right?===
 
===I assume this is not BP canon, right?===
 
First of all, congratulations on this release. It's always a good thing when fans come out with new content for everyone to enjoy. My tiny, uber tiny, microscopical concern is related to the fact that the current setting of Chanticleer articles on the Wiki implies it's BP canon, but I assume it's not. This should be specified and enforced in descriptions, as visitors who're not familiar with the details may believe this is an official BP campaign. I see the campaign is described as a "spin off" but that term doesn't necessarily imply it's not canon. Just my 0.02€. - [[User:Mobius|Mobius]] ([[User talk:Mobius|talk]]) 09:47, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
 
First of all, congratulations on this release. It's always a good thing when fans come out with new content for everyone to enjoy. My tiny, uber tiny, microscopical concern is related to the fact that the current setting of Chanticleer articles on the Wiki implies it's BP canon, but I assume it's not. This should be specified and enforced in descriptions, as visitors who're not familiar with the details may believe this is an official BP campaign. I see the campaign is described as a "spin off" but that term doesn't necessarily imply it's not canon. Just my 0.02€. - [[User:Mobius|Mobius]] ([[User talk:Mobius|talk]]) 09:47, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
 +
 +
*I developed Chanticleer with the cooperation and assistance of Darius and The_E of the BP team on plot points, so that it stays in line with what is canon for War in Heaven Acts 4 and 5.  Chanticleer wasn't developed by the BP team, but it has their blessing.  (If Darius wants me to revert the Wiki changes, I will, obviously.) [[User:Qweqwe321|Qweqwe321]] ([[User talk:Qweqwe321|talk]]) 11:30, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
 +
 +
** Awesome, feel free to specify that in the campaign's description. It's a spin off developed with the support of BP team member. :-) - [[User:Mobius|Mobius]] ([[User talk:Mobius|talk]]) 08:20, 15 September 2023 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 08:20, 15 September 2023

I assume this is not BP canon, right?

First of all, congratulations on this release. It's always a good thing when fans come out with new content for everyone to enjoy. My tiny, uber tiny, microscopical concern is related to the fact that the current setting of Chanticleer articles on the Wiki implies it's BP canon, but I assume it's not. This should be specified and enforced in descriptions, as visitors who're not familiar with the details may believe this is an official BP campaign. I see the campaign is described as a "spin off" but that term doesn't necessarily imply it's not canon. Just my 0.02€. - Mobius (talk) 09:47, 14 September 2023 (UTC)

  • I developed Chanticleer with the cooperation and assistance of Darius and The_E of the BP team on plot points, so that it stays in line with what is canon for War in Heaven Acts 4 and 5. Chanticleer wasn't developed by the BP team, but it has their blessing. (If Darius wants me to revert the Wiki changes, I will, obviously.) Qweqwe321 (talk) 11:30, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
    • Awesome, feel free to specify that in the campaign's description. It's a spin off developed with the support of BP team member. :-) - Mobius (talk) 08:20, 15 September 2023 (UTC)