Difference between revisions of "Talk:Crisis in Capella"
m |
|||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | What's with the "''this is not canon, because I say so''" policy? Okay then, let's see; a) Volition ''made'' the game demo, b) they ''released'' it, c) they ''made the missions(!)'', | + | What's with the "''this is not canon, because I say so''" policy? Okay then, let's see; a) Volition ''made'' the game demo, b) they ''released'' it, c) they ''made the missions(!)'', d) they re-released them on their website, d) the missions ''tie in with the FS2 story line''(!!) and f) '''V''' later even ''re-re-released'' them. How the (expletive) can ''anyone'' uphold the -- let's face it -- quite delusional idea that this is ''not'' canon? Because the staff from V hasn't sent each and every user a handwritten, personalized letter pointing out that these missions ''are'', in fact, taking place in the FS universe? (As an aside, they didn't do so for the retail version, either..) Then again, user made campaigns(!) ''are'' considered canon? Wow. I'm thoroughly impressed. Sorry for the rant, but I just had to, y'know. --[[User:Selectah|Selectah]] 12:06, 6 November 2006 (UTC) |
| + | |||
| + | *Oh, btw; the article header is misspelled. Oh, btw 2; I'm removing the non-canon mention if no-one opposes. --[[User:Selectah|Selectah]] 14:18, 6 November 2006 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | The ''only'' thing that ''could'' be seen as being non-canon is the mention of the [[GTD Aquitaine]] in the command debriefing. Notwithstanding that the [[GTD Aquitaine]] was present throughout the Second Shivan Incursion, ''anybody'' can be recommended a transfer ''anywhere'' in ''any'' fleet. The tiny mention in the debriefing is simply not enough to warrant the bold claim "''like dude this is like not canon because it just like isn't y'know''". IMVHO. --[[User:Selectah|Selectah]] 11:58, 9 November 2006 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Agreed, whatever idiot put it back in, is... well, an idiot. Someone should do the same for [[Crimson Sky]].--[[User:Aardwolf|Aardwolf]] 12:59, 7 February 2007 (CST) | ||
Latest revision as of 18:59, 7 February 2007
What's with the "this is not canon, because I say so" policy? Okay then, let's see; a) Volition made the game demo, b) they released it, c) they made the missions(!), d) they re-released them on their website, d) the missions tie in with the FS2 story line(!!) and f) V later even re-re-released them. How the (expletive) can anyone uphold the -- let's face it -- quite delusional idea that this is not canon? Because the staff from V hasn't sent each and every user a handwritten, personalized letter pointing out that these missions are, in fact, taking place in the FS universe? (As an aside, they didn't do so for the retail version, either..) Then again, user made campaigns(!) are considered canon? Wow. I'm thoroughly impressed. Sorry for the rant, but I just had to, y'know. --Selectah 12:06, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
- Oh, btw; the article header is misspelled. Oh, btw 2; I'm removing the non-canon mention if no-one opposes. --Selectah 14:18, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
The only thing that could be seen as being non-canon is the mention of the GTD Aquitaine in the command debriefing. Notwithstanding that the GTD Aquitaine was present throughout the Second Shivan Incursion, anybody can be recommended a transfer anywhere in any fleet. The tiny mention in the debriefing is simply not enough to warrant the bold claim "like dude this is like not canon because it just like isn't y'know". IMVHO. --Selectah 11:58, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
Agreed, whatever idiot put it back in, is... well, an idiot. Someone should do the same for Crimson Sky.--Aardwolf 12:59, 7 February 2007 (CST)
