Difference between revisions of "Talk:Corporations"
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
::Looks like the Master's already removed it. - [[User:Snail|Snail]] 08:48, 4 July 2008 (CDT) | ::Looks like the Master's already removed it. - [[User:Snail|Snail]] 08:48, 4 July 2008 (CDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ==Non-Canon Highlighting== | ||
| + | |||
| + | If we use the gray text system this entire article should be highlighted in gray. Practically none of this information is canon. - [[User:Snail|Snail]] 06:07, 18 July 2008 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 11:07, 18 July 2008
The non canon corps should be flagged as such, i've already flagged MT, but if there's any others that are in there or will be added they should be flagged also. -oohal
WTF Snapka/Flegel?
And this stuff about snapka/flegel or whatever is both not canon and not encyclopedic--this is an encyclopedia, not a joke.
Hades and Triton?!!?
What the hell? Hades was made by Triton Dynamics? Impossible! It must be made by NTF Dynamics.Nubbles 04:22, 12 August 2007 (CDT)
The Hades was constructed by the GTI. And what are you saying about NTF Dynamics? - Supernova 12:52. 12 August, 2007 (EST)
- Err...Sarcasm? Nubbles 14:21, 12 August 2007 (CDT)
Since the Loki was made by HR, I think that it stands to reason that the Hades was also constructed by HR (Han Ronald) Snail 18:28, 12 August, 2007 (GMT)
- Not to be stubborn or mean, but I think Han-Ronald "copied" the design and manufactured it. But the original is by GTI.Nubbles 14:21, 12 August 2007 (CDT)
- The FS1 table does say that the Loki is HR. I think it was "commissioned" by GTI. Snail 10:38, 13 August, 2007 (GMT)
Norman Inc
I say get rid of it. Only widely accepted stuff should be included on a page like this (like MT) or deleted altogether. - Snail 17:45, 3 July 2008 (CDT)
- I'm inclined to agree that Norman should be removed, but I'd extend the suggestion to include purging all of the corporations that are never so much as mentioned in a canon FreeSpace campaign. Noncanon corporations could probably be a worthy topic for another page, but I think that moving away from these mixed canon-noncanon pages would be a good precedent to set. -- BlueFlames 18:02, 3 July 2008 (CDT)
- Looks like the Master's already removed it. - Snail 08:48, 4 July 2008 (CDT)
Non-Canon Highlighting
If we use the gray text system this entire article should be highlighted in gray. Practically none of this information is canon. - Snail 06:07, 18 July 2008 (CDT)
