Difference between revisions of "Talk:Star Wars"

From FreeSpace Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m
m
 
Line 5: Line 5:
 
****I fixed it by deleting most of it. - [[User:Snail|Snail]] 20:10, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
 
****I fixed it by deleting most of it. - [[User:Snail|Snail]] 20:10, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
 
*****Thereby making it mostly irrelevant. +1 for summary deletion. [[User:The E|The E]], 22:54, 20 November 2009
 
*****Thereby making it mostly irrelevant. +1 for summary deletion. [[User:The E|The E]], 22:54, 20 November 2009
 +
******GB, that could be a mere oversight. However, I agree that in its current form, it's irrelevant to a (the?) FreeSpace-themed wiki. - [[User:TopAce|TopAce]] 12:03, 21 November 2009 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 12:03, 21 November 2009

Where should we put this? Which pages should link here, and into which category should it belong? Because I cannot answer either of these. At the moment, it's an orphaned page (meaning you have zero chance of finding it unless you're using the Search function). TopAce 21:09, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

  • I think link it from the Fate of the galaxy page. It may be well searched after FOTG comes out? Grunt minion22 5:37, 20 November 2009
    • One instance doesn't justify that a separate page for it should exist. It's about how FreeSpace and Star Wars are compared by the community on the forums. This debate is not relevant to FotG anyway, since we are definitely not planning these two universes to meet. - TopAce 18:39, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
      • Can we delete this POS page? It says Star Wars is a novel, for goodness sake. General Battuta 19:20, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
        • I fixed it by deleting most of it. - Snail 20:10, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
          • Thereby making it mostly irrelevant. +1 for summary deletion. The E, 22:54, 20 November 2009
            • GB, that could be a mere oversight. However, I agree that in its current form, it's irrelevant to a (the?) FreeSpace-themed wiki. - TopAce 12:03, 21 November 2009 (UTC)