Difference between revisions of "Talk:GTB Hydra"
From FreeSpace Wiki
m |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
*Well, the Hydra is not canon. A table hack, which gives it a new name and different table data, is enough to justify the non-canon tag. Of course it doesn't fit hundred percent into the user-made category, but creating a separate category for it would be redundant. - [[User:TopAce|TopAce]] 18:37, 17 December 2010 (UTC) | *Well, the Hydra is not canon. A table hack, which gives it a new name and different table data, is enough to justify the non-canon tag. Of course it doesn't fit hundred percent into the user-made category, but creating a separate category for it would be redundant. - [[User:TopAce|TopAce]] 18:37, 17 December 2010 (UTC) | ||
**Do we even need a wiki page for it? Anyone can open ships.tbl and, add 10 to all the secondary bank capacities, and add "UD-8 Kayser" to the allowed primary weapons list... It doesn't even have a retexture. [[User:Droid803|Droid803]] 20:06, 17 December 2010 (UTC) | **Do we even need a wiki page for it? Anyone can open ships.tbl and, add 10 to all the secondary bank capacities, and add "UD-8 Kayser" to the allowed primary weapons list... It doesn't even have a retexture. [[User:Droid803|Droid803]] 20:06, 17 December 2010 (UTC) | ||
| − | + | **Just remove everything but the class description and instead comment at the top that it's identical to the DH, but is compatible with Kaysers. --[[User:Monitor|Monitor]] 22:11, 17 December 2010 (UTC) | |
| − | + | ***The Wiki page is 100% justified. If you want to look it up, this article must be here. You may know without any reference how it's different from the Artemis D.H., but let's respect those that don't. - [[User:TopAce|TopAce]] 22:24, 17 December 2010 (UTC) | |
Revision as of 22:24, 17 December 2010
I think this article should be deleted or removed from the wiki ship list. It's just a canon model, with canon textures and a hacked table. This should not be added as a "User-Made Ship". This is my opinion. ktistai228 2:32 pm, GMT+2, 17 December 2010
- Well, the Hydra is not canon. A table hack, which gives it a new name and different table data, is enough to justify the non-canon tag. Of course it doesn't fit hundred percent into the user-made category, but creating a separate category for it would be redundant. - TopAce 18:37, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
- Do we even need a wiki page for it? Anyone can open ships.tbl and, add 10 to all the secondary bank capacities, and add "UD-8 Kayser" to the allowed primary weapons list... It doesn't even have a retexture. Droid803 20:06, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
- Just remove everything but the class description and instead comment at the top that it's identical to the DH, but is compatible with Kaysers. --Monitor 22:11, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
- The Wiki page is 100% justified. If you want to look it up, this article must be here. You may know without any reference how it's different from the Artemis D.H., but let's respect those that don't. - TopAce 22:24, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
