Difference between revisions of "Talk:Parliamentary Vasudan Empire"

Revision as of 21:41, 2 April 2009

The speculative section is also contradictory to canon in several places. I will nuke it if nobody objects. - Snail 06:00, 18 July 2008 (CDT)

Is it a TVWP-specific edit or a random "I think this happened" edit? If it's the former, it should be stated that "This section is based on the Terran-Vasudan War Project." Otherwise nuke it. The GTA article also has a similar section, perhaps that should be revised to deleted, too. - TopAce 06:06, 18 July 2008 (CDT)
- Doesn't look like it's TVWP to me, it was added since the beginning by some random guest guy. Snail 06:26, 18 July 2008 (CDT)
  - Removed. - TopAce 06:36, 18 July 2008 (CDT)

I have added a large chunk of non-canon information to the article, which I have clearly made up. However it is clearly marked. Do you find this acceptable? (note that the addition follows non-canon guidelines strictly) - Snail 20:38, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
- It's interesting. I'd suggest to add two sections, "Canon" and "Non-canon"(or "Description" and "Non-canon") to emphasize the fact that the current parts of the page should be separated. Other than that, good job - it'd be nice to have several non-canon parts for each campaign showing original aspects of the PVE. Needless to say that TVWP's part will probably be the longest one. --- Mobius

Revision as of 20:38, 2 April 2009 (view source) Snail (talk \| contribs) m (Social Experiment explanation.) ← Older edit		Revision as of 21:41, 2 April 2009 (view source) Mobius (talk \| contribs) (I think it could be improved even more, but other than that it works just fine) Newer edit →
Line 9:		Line 9:

	*I have added a large chunk of non-canon information to the article, which I have clearly made up. However it is clearly marked. Do you find this acceptable? (note that the addition follows non-canon guidelines strictly) - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 20:38, 2 April 2009 (UTC)		*I have added a large chunk of non-canon information to the article, which I have clearly made up. However it is clearly marked. Do you find this acceptable? (note that the addition follows non-canon guidelines strictly) - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 20:38, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
		+	**It's interesting. I'd suggest to add two sections, "Canon" and "Non-canon"(or "Description" and "Non-canon") to emphasize the fact that the current parts of the page should be separated. Other than that, good job - it'd be nice to have several non-canon parts for each campaign showing original aspects of the PVE. Needless to say that TVWP's part will probably be the longest one. --- [[User:Mobius\|Mobius]]