Difference between revisions of "Talk:Parliamentary Vasudan Empire"
From FreeSpace Wiki
m (Reply) |
(Questioning Canonicity of Statements) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | ==Canonicity of Statements== | ||
| + | |||
| + | "The capital of the PVE was Vasuda Prime until it was devastated by SD Lucifer in 2335. ''Afterwards, the capital was moved to Aldebaran.''"<br> | ||
| + | Source? - [[User:Snail|Snail]] 11:58, 5 August 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
==Previous Speculative Section== | ==Previous Speculative Section== | ||
Revision as of 11:58, 5 August 2009
Canonicity of Statements
"The capital of the PVE was Vasuda Prime until it was devastated by SD Lucifer in 2335. Afterwards, the capital was moved to Aldebaran."
Source? - Snail 11:58, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
Previous Speculative Section
The speculative section is also contradictory to canon in several places. I will nuke it if nobody objects. - Snail 06:00, 18 July 2008 (CDT)
- Is it a TVWP-specific edit or a random "I think this happened" edit? If it's the former, it should be stated that "This section is based on the Terran-Vasudan War Project." Otherwise nuke it. The GTA article also has a similar section, perhaps that should be revised to deleted, too. - TopAce 06:06, 18 July 2008 (CDT)
Non-Canon Info: This is a Social Experiment
- I have added a large chunk of non-canon information to the article, which I have clearly made up. However it is clearly marked. Do you find this acceptable? (note that the addition follows non-canon guidelines strictly) - Snail 20:38, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
- It's interesting. I'd suggest to add two sections, "Canon" and "Non-canon"(or "Description" and "Non-canon") to emphasize the fact that the current parts of the page should be separated. Other than that, good job - it'd be nice to have several non-canon parts for each campaign showing original aspects of the PVE. Needless to say that TVWP's part will probably be the longest one. --- Mobius
- TBH I agreed with Wanderer's idea of creating a subpage for non-canon stuff. Would add a lot of clarity to the Wiki. Not only that, but it'd be a place to add even more non-canon data without being obstructive. In that way we could have a whole load of non-canon subpages which could become a repository for all user-made campaigns - Without distracting from the canon info (which was my main annoyance about the issue). - Snail 21:48, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
- It may work as long as either versions are properly linked throughout the Wiki. --- Mobius
- TBH I agreed with Wanderer's idea of creating a subpage for non-canon stuff. Would add a lot of clarity to the Wiki. Not only that, but it'd be a place to add even more non-canon data without being obstructive. In that way we could have a whole load of non-canon subpages which could become a repository for all user-made campaigns - Without distracting from the canon info (which was my main annoyance about the issue). - Snail 21:48, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
- It's interesting. I'd suggest to add two sections, "Canon" and "Non-canon"(or "Description" and "Non-canon") to emphasize the fact that the current parts of the page should be separated. Other than that, good job - it'd be nice to have several non-canon parts for each campaign showing original aspects of the PVE. Needless to say that TVWP's part will probably be the longest one. --- Mobius
