Difference between revisions of "Talk:GVC Mekhet"
From FreeSpace Wiki
(Reply) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This article is really weird with all this different stats and armaments. Should we create separate articles or agree on just one of these incarnations? - [[User:Snail|Snail]] 13:19, 30 May 2009 (UTC) | This article is really weird with all this different stats and armaments. Should we create separate articles or agree on just one of these incarnations? - [[User:Snail|Snail]] 13:19, 30 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
*I do agree that the article might be confusing, but creating separate articles would be even more confusing. The Mekhet is a flexible custom ship which may be used in several periods, as the different tech entries and stats show. I assume this was the sip creator's will, and we need to keep everything as it is. Finally, I think Veteran Comments should be divided to prevent further confusion. --- [[User:Mobius|Mobius]] | *I do agree that the article might be confusing, but creating separate articles would be even more confusing. The Mekhet is a flexible custom ship which may be used in several periods, as the different tech entries and stats show. I assume this was the sip creator's will, and we need to keep everything as it is. Finally, I think Veteran Comments should be divided to prevent further confusion. --- [[User:Mobius|Mobius]] | ||
| + | *This article is confusing and should follow something that's more consistent. Revising the article would be greatly appreciated. [[User:SDM|SDM]] | ||
Revision as of 15:00, 10 March 2011
This article is really weird with all this different stats and armaments. Should we create separate articles or agree on just one of these incarnations? - Snail 13:19, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
- I do agree that the article might be confusing, but creating separate articles would be even more confusing. The Mekhet is a flexible custom ship which may be used in several periods, as the different tech entries and stats show. I assume this was the sip creator's will, and we need to keep everything as it is. Finally, I think Veteran Comments should be divided to prevent further confusion. --- Mobius
- This article is confusing and should follow something that's more consistent. Revising the article would be greatly appreciated. SDM
