Difference between revisions of "Veteran Comments policy"
m (Internal link added for Leech Cannon.) |
m (the) |
||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
* Notes for FREDders (e.g. the [[SB Nephilim|''Nephilim'']] doesn't carry bombs in its default loadout; certain bombers carry [[GTM Phoenix V|Phoenix missile]]s but the [[good-secondary-time]] SEXP must be used to enable them to fire). | * Notes for FREDders (e.g. the [[SB Nephilim|''Nephilim'']] doesn't carry bombs in its default loadout; certain bombers carry [[GTM Phoenix V|Phoenix missile]]s but the [[good-secondary-time]] SEXP must be used to enable them to fire). | ||
* Info on special gun placements and which banks correspond to which guns (e.g. the [[GTB Ursa|''Ursa'']]'s top-right gun is inaccurate against anything small). | * Info on special gun placements and which banks correspond to which guns (e.g. the [[GTB Ursa|''Ursa'']]'s top-right gun is inaccurate against anything small). | ||
− | * Warnings about any problems with the ship (e.g. [[GVF Tauret|''Tauret'']] cannot really use Kaysers due to energy constraints). | + | * Warnings about any problems with the ship (e.g. the [[GVF Tauret|''Tauret'']] cannot really use Kaysers due to energy constraints). |
* Weaknesses (e.g. the [[GTF Valkyrie|''Valkyrie'']]'s Comms tends to get disabled when unshielded, which may cause the player to miss critical dialogue). | * Weaknesses (e.g. the [[GTF Valkyrie|''Valkyrie'']]'s Comms tends to get disabled when unshielded, which may cause the player to miss critical dialogue). | ||
− | * Any interesting facts that have not been pointed out elsewhere (e.g. mediavps version of the [[GTC Aeolus|''Aeolus'']] adds a fighterbay). | + | * Any interesting facts that have not been pointed out elsewhere (e.g. the mediavps version of the [[GTC Aeolus|''Aeolus'']] adds a fighterbay). |
| | | | ||
* Blind spots (e.g. in front and ever so slightly above a [[SCv Moloch|''Moloch'']], only a single blob turret can reach you). | * Blind spots (e.g. in front and ever so slightly above a [[SCv Moloch|''Moloch'']], only a single blob turret can reach you). | ||
Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
* Highly subjective and debatable statements like "extremely weak" or "totally useless" that are not backed up by facts. | * Highly subjective and debatable statements like "extremely weak" or "totally useless" that are not backed up by facts. | ||
* Vulgarities (e.g. "the [[GTW Leech Cannon]] is fucking shit"). | * Vulgarities (e.g. "the [[GTW Leech Cannon]] is fucking shit"). | ||
− | * Redundancy with comments already made; if a particular facet of tactics, weapons, or facts about a ship has already been pointed out, | + | * Redundancy with comments already made; if a particular facet of tactics, weapons, or facts about a ship has already been pointed out, do not repeat it. |
|} | |} | ||
Revision as of 14:06, 25 August 2020
The FreeSpace Wiki's Veteran Comments policy, in a nutshell, is:
Do not treat the Veteran Comments section like MySpace, Facebook, or Twitter.
Verified and useful information is valued. Highly subjective and useless comments are not.
Early in 2008, the FreeSpace Wiki community came to the consensus that many of its Veteran Comments sections had devolved into blogs. Veteran Comments were originally introduced to provide useful information about various ships that were not apparent from their table statistics and/or in-game descriptions. Consequently, contributors were asked to maintain a certain level of quality in their Comments.
A discussion on the Hard Light Productions forums regarding the subject has come to the following conclusions, and some examples of what a Veteran Comment should and should not contain:
All Articles | Capital Ship Articles | |
Should Contain |
|
|
Should Not Contain |
|
This is a Wiki, so Veteran Comments are not handled like forum posts by individual users—other contributors are allowed to edit any Veteran Comments for accuracy, clarity of expression, or grammar. For this reason, do not sign any Veteran Comments you make.
Through all this, remember that this policy is not meant to discourage helpful contributors. Be bold, as they say on Wikipedia. If you are unsure of something, start a discussion on the Talk Page or forums. If you are fairly certain of it, edit the article accordingly. Thanks to the Wiki architecture, errors can be corrected or removed later.