Difference between revisions of "Talk:FreeSpace 2-era craft"
From FreeSpace Wiki
(New page: Oh god... Please say you didn't misspell maneuverability as manuverability in every single article here... - Snail) |
m (moved Talk:FreeSpace 2 Era Craft to Talk:FreeSpace 2-era craft: This is the second most frequently visited page. Let's spell its title correctly (notice the hyphen).) |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Oh god... Please say you didn't misspell maneuverability as manuverability in every single article here... - [[User:Snail|Snail]] | Oh god... Please say you didn't misspell maneuverability as manuverability in every single article here... - [[User:Snail|Snail]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | *Looks like it. FS1 ships too, if the couple of ships I peeked at are anything to go by. Might be worthwhile migrating the ship stats to a template if we have to go through the lot anyway, similar to what Bruce89 has done for weapons with [[Template:Primary]]. - [[User:Shade|Shade]] 09:38, 27 August 2007 (CDT) | ||
| + | ** Went ahead and made a template for ship stats, based on the one for primaries above. Linkage: [[Template:Ship_Stats]]. And to see it in use, check the [[GTB Ursa]] page that I tested it on. So if a typo ever creeps into that in the future, we only need to change it in one place. - [[User:Shade|Shade]] 10:12, 27 August 2007 (CDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 12:03, 11 October 2009
Oh god... Please say you didn't misspell maneuverability as manuverability in every single article here... - Snail
- Looks like it. FS1 ships too, if the couple of ships I peeked at are anything to go by. Might be worthwhile migrating the ship stats to a template if we have to go through the lot anyway, similar to what Bruce89 has done for weapons with Template:Primary. - Shade 09:38, 27 August 2007 (CDT)
- Went ahead and made a template for ship stats, based on the one for primaries above. Linkage: Template:Ship_Stats. And to see it in use, check the GTB Ursa page that I tested it on. So if a typo ever creeps into that in the future, we only need to change it in one place. - Shade 10:12, 27 August 2007 (CDT)
