GTM Interceptor

GTM-9 Interceptor

Weapons in Descent: FreeSpace

Primaries Secondaries Turrets Weapon Comparison Table, FS1

Weapons in FreeSpace 2

Primaries Secondaries Turrets Weapon Comparison Table, FS2

The GTM-9 Interceptor

Tech Room Data

All-aspect seeking - laser tracking senses energy reflected off a target from the primary weapon systems of the target, increasing single-pass kill probability - medium payload (18.5 Kt) - missile is designed to pierce reinforced hull, thus securing itself to the target, prior to detonating (15 ms delay).

This is the standard issue fighter-killer in the GTA. Designed to take out fighters with minimum hassle, a simple lock is all that is needed to grab the enemies attention. Short lock time, good speed, and decent payload makes this the best missile to use against all but the strongest ships. It's effectiveness against large targets, however, is less than a typical laser run, making this primarily a ship to ship missile.

Performance

Statistics - Interceptor

Range	1 250 m
Reload time	2.0 s
Velocity	250 ms-1
Base Damage	150
Armor Damage	Full	150
Shield Damage	Good	120
Subsystem Damage	Average	75
Shockwave Radius	0 m
Type:	Aspect Seeking
View Cone:	N / A
Minimum Lock Time:	2.0 s
Turn Rate (360 degrees):	1.0 s

Statistics - Inteceptor#weak

Range	1 250 m
Reload time	3.0 s
Velocity	250 ms-1
Base Damage	60
Armor Damage	Full	60
Shield Damage	Good	48
Subsystem Damage	Average	30
Shockwave Radius	0 m
Type:	Aspect Seeking
View Cone:	N / A
Minimum Lock Time:	2.0 s
Turn Rate (360 degrees):	1.0 s

Notes

Veteran Comments

Please read the Veteran Comments policy before editing this section.

The Interceptor missile is less maneuverable and larger than its descendant the GTM Harpoon, so you'll need to compensate, get in close, use a low angle-of-deflection (make sure you have a clear shot into your enemies aft), and use them sparingly. They are infinitely more effective than the GTM MX-50 they replace. I generally use the GTM Hornet in its stead, when I can, because of the Hornet's greater stopping power. However, the Interceptor is much more effective at destroying fast, maneuverable targets like the SF Dragon.

For me this missile was the primary anti-fighter missile in the game. Whatever you couldn't easily take out with your cannons could be handled with twin Interceptors.

For FS1: A vastly underrated weapon. It may not quite have the punch of the Hornets, but it is far more liable to find its target, should it have any semblance of mobility. Also great for picking off subsystems - can't be intercepted like GTM Stilettos.

The performance of the Interceptor, and indeed all FS1 missiles, against shielded targets is rather lackluster. It is most effective to knock out enemy shields with your cannons first and then use the Interceptor as a fire-and-forget finishing weapon, allowing you to move on quickly. Be advised it is not necessarily one-shot-one-kill even then however.

Compared to the Harpoon, the Interceptor is what the Lucifer is to the Colossus. Although it doesn't stand a comparison to it, the Interceptor does its job adequately in FS1. I find the Interceptor a better anti-fighter weapon than the Hornet, but it's still slightly worse than the GTM Fury, especially against bombers. In the FSPort, the Interceptor has the homing ability of the Harpoon, making it more effective compared to its "retail FS1" self. Yes, the Interceptor's homing system is different than that of the Harpoon. Needless to say, the Interceptor is less accurate. Add to that its larger payload and slower engines. It takes some practice to use the Interceptor well. Usually, it's best to use the Interceptor if you're just behind the target.