Difference between revisions of "Talk:NTF Iceni"

Revision as of 14:15, 12 April 2009

Should the text above the TOC be moved into the description? -oohal

No, it is an intro. Or rather it is supposed to be the intro. - Wanderer 11:50, 24 Dec 2005 (GMT)

my mistake -oohal

Does the non-canon text near the start of the article really fit? My inclination is to remove it, since most/all of the other ship pages seem devoted to canon information and veteran comments. I'll pull it early this week, if there's no objection. -- BlueFlames 12:05, 16 March 2008 (CST)
- Personally, I think that information is useful to some extent for FREDders and mission designers. It is also quite interesting regarding the section where it talks about the Blueprint. However, I could agree with you that it is not a the best place to put such information. So heres what I recommend: Keep the information, but place it somwhere else. Nubbles 07:14, 17 March 2008 (CST)

Should the Freedom Shipyards count as manufacturer of the NTF Iceni? --- Mobius

It IS listed as the builder in the ship's description. Ngtm1r 14:15, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

@@ Line 14: / Line 14: @@
 ==Manufacturer: Freedom Shipyards?==
 Should the Freedom Shipyards count as manufacturer of the NTF Iceni? --- [[User:Mobius|Mobius]]
+It IS listed as the builder in the ship's description. [[User:Ngtm1r|Ngtm1r]] 14:15, 12 April 2009 (UTC)