Difference between revisions of "Talk:OT"
From FreeSpace Wiki
m |
(→I agree with Snail: new section) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
*I do use that acronym. The Yes to No ratio is 1:1. --- [[User:Mobius|Mobius]] | *I do use that acronym. The Yes to No ratio is 1:1. --- [[User:Mobius|Mobius]] | ||
**You're also the only person who uses the acronym I believe. As I said, it has to be an ''established'' acronym, not a random one. -- [[User:Snail|Snail]] 19:29, 7 June 2009 (UTC) | **You're also the only person who uses the acronym I believe. As I said, it has to be an ''established'' acronym, not a random one. -- [[User:Snail|Snail]] 19:29, 7 June 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == I agree with Snail == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Unfortunately, he's right. I have NEVER heard OT used. Try not to pull random acronyms out of the air when making a contribution. | ||
Revision as of 19:31, 7 June 2009
Since when does "OT" stand for Operation Thresher? I've never seen that acronym used anywhere before now. I don't think it's appropriate to just make up random acronyms and redirect everything. It has to be an established and understood acronym before redirecting can happen IMO. - Snail 17:56, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
- I do use that acronym. The Yes to No ratio is 1:1. --- Mobius
- You're also the only person who uses the acronym I believe. As I said, it has to be an established acronym, not a random one. -- Snail 19:29, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
I agree with Snail
Unfortunately, he's right. I have NEVER heard OT used. Try not to pull random acronyms out of the air when making a contribution.
