Difference between revisions of "Talk:Silent Threat: Reborn continuity"
From FreeSpace Wiki
Goober5000 (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
G-canon kinda implies that it is in some way canon, which it ain't. How's about we rename it G-''fanon''? After all, it's fanon not canon. - [[User:Snail|Snail]] 21:16, 7 June 2009 (UTC) | G-canon kinda implies that it is in some way canon, which it ain't. How's about we rename it G-''fanon''? After all, it's fanon not canon. - [[User:Snail|Snail]] 21:16, 7 June 2009 (UTC) | ||
*Sorry, but I don't understand. First of all, ''G-canon'' is the term I read on HLP so using a different term would be pointless (I'm not inventing anything). Also, I'd like to remember that the article specifies that G-canon isn't V canon. We have several terms with the word canon on them (like "INF canon") which surely aren't connected to V. --- [[User:Mobius|Mobius]] | *Sorry, but I don't understand. First of all, ''G-canon'' is the term I read on HLP so using a different term would be pointless (I'm not inventing anything). Also, I'd like to remember that the article specifies that G-canon isn't V canon. We have several terms with the word canon on them (like "INF canon") which surely aren't connected to V. --- [[User:Mobius|Mobius]] | ||
| − | **I've rewritten the main page to clarify these discrepancies. However the GTI is most certainly not the NTF. | + | **I've rewritten the main page to clarify these discrepancies. However the GTI is most certainly not the NTF. - [[User:Goober5000|Goober5000]] 19:11, 9 June 2009 (UTC) |
***Does anyone actually use this term? It's interesting and kind of cool, but this seems like a case of trying to create the term rather than referring to something in broad use. [[User:General Battuta|General Battuta]] 03:14, 9 June 2009 (UTC) | ***Does anyone actually use this term? It's interesting and kind of cool, but this seems like a case of trying to create the term rather than referring to something in broad use. [[User:General Battuta|General Battuta]] 03:14, 9 June 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | ****It was used in a forum thread at least once. However I don't know if it was used more than that. :) Is there a page for "Blue Planet canon", "Inferno canon", "Derelict canon", etc.? If not, we could probably delete this page. - [[User:Goober5000|Goober5000]] 19:11, 9 June 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 19:11, 9 June 2009
G-canon kinda implies that it is in some way canon, which it ain't. How's about we rename it G-fanon? After all, it's fanon not canon. - Snail 21:16, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
- Sorry, but I don't understand. First of all, G-canon is the term I read on HLP so using a different term would be pointless (I'm not inventing anything). Also, I'd like to remember that the article specifies that G-canon isn't V canon. We have several terms with the word canon on them (like "INF canon") which surely aren't connected to V. --- Mobius
- I've rewritten the main page to clarify these discrepancies. However the GTI is most certainly not the NTF. - Goober5000 19:11, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
- Does anyone actually use this term? It's interesting and kind of cool, but this seems like a case of trying to create the term rather than referring to something in broad use. General Battuta 03:14, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
- It was used in a forum thread at least once. However I don't know if it was used more than that. :) Is there a page for "Blue Planet canon", "Inferno canon", "Derelict canon", etc.? If not, we could probably delete this page. - Goober5000 19:11, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
- Does anyone actually use this term? It's interesting and kind of cool, but this seems like a case of trying to create the term rather than referring to something in broad use. General Battuta 03:14, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
- I've rewritten the main page to clarify these discrepancies. However the GTI is most certainly not the NTF. - Goober5000 19:11, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
