Difference between revisions of "GTF Hercules Mark II"

From FreeSpace Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Gallery)
(Veteran Comments)
Line 106: Line 106:
  
  
''It's surprisingly maneuverable, but is slow as hell. Its thick armour, heavy shielding and huge secondary banks give you the opportunity to survive long missions without support, like [[Love the Treason]]. However, the [[GVF Tauret|Tauret]] is a better assault fighter, with more guns, even more missiles and less maneuverability.''}}
+
''It's surprisingly maneuverable, but is slow as hell. Its thick armour, heavy shielding and huge secondary banks give you the opportunity to survive long missions without support, like [[Love the Treason]]. However, the [[GVF Tauret|Tauret]] is a better assault fighter, with more guns, even more missiles and less maneuverability.''
 +
 
 +
This ship takes more after the *SF Basilisk* than after the Hercules Mk. II's predecessor, the Original Hercules. Just look at the gun slots. Both the Herc II and the Basilisk have two guns per slot. The Herc I has four guns in the first slot and two in the second. Also, the Herc Mk. II has the *exact* same missile capacity of the Basilisk. Both are designed to be more manueverable heavy assault craft. The main differences are that the Herc Mk. II has a slightly slower turn time than the Basilisk (according to the ship tables), the Herc II's default max velocity (assuming that energy is equally diverted to guns, shields and afterburner) is 55 while the Basilisk appears to be at 65, the Herc II has more hull hit points than the Basilisk but has fewer shield hit points than the Basilisk.
 +
 
 +
}}
  
 
[[Category:Ship]]
 
[[Category:Ship]]

Revision as of 03:48, 16 June 2012

Terran ships
Fighters
Bombers
Transports and freighters
Cruisers
Capital ships
Installations
Misc Ships
Sentry Guns
Cargo Containers
Vasudan ships
Fighters
Bombers
Transports and freighters
Cruisers
Capital ships
Misc Ships
Sentry Guns
Cargo Containers
Shivan ships
Fighters
Bombers
Transports and freighters
Cruisers
Capital ships
Sentry Guns
Cargo Containers
Notable ships of FreeSpace 1


Terran ships
Fighters
Bombers
Transports and freighters
Cruisers and corvettes
Capital ships
Installations
Misc ships
Sentry Guns
Cargo Containers
Vasudan ships
Fighters
Bombers
Transports and freighters
Cruisers and corvettes
Capital ships
Misc ships
Sentry Guns
Cargo Containers
Shivan ships
Fighters
Bombers
Transports and freighters
Cruisers and corvettes
Capital ships
Misc ships
Sentry Guns
Cargo Containers
Notable ships of FreeSpace 2



The GTF Hercules Mark II was a replacement for the original Great War-era GTF Hercules. It is superior in most aspects of the original Hercules, with the notable exception of primary firepower. This sacrifice is offset by more space for secondary weapons.

Description:

Gtfherculesmarkii-old.jpg
The GTF Hercules Mark II


FS2 Demo Tech Room Description

The second generation of the Hercules fighter. It is faster, more maneuverable, and still carries a decent payload.

FS2 Tech Room Description

The GTF Hercules Mark II is the next generation of Terran heavy assault fighter. Introduced during the Great War, the original Herc's balance of firepower and maneuverability made it the most versatile strike fighter in the fleet. Some military historians have claimed the Hercules won the Great War, citing its deployment in key battles near the end of the Shivan conflict. Implementing recent advances in fusion drive technology, the Mark II improves the assault fighter's speed and maneuverability without sacrificing loadout capacity.

Developer Notes

None

Performance:

Statistics

Type Heavy Assault
Manufacturer RNI Systems (FS2)
KresCo Engineering (FS2 Demo)
Maneuverability Average
Yaw, Pitch, Roll 55.0 - 65.0 s
Max Velocity 120.0 ms-1
Max Afterburner Velocity Heavy ms-1
Armor 275
Hitpoints 610
Shields 17
Length {{{10}}} m


Armaments

FreeSpace 2
Bank Guns Standard Loadout
1st 2 Subach HL-7
2nd 2 Prometheus R
Compatible Primaries
Subach HL-7, Akheton SDG, Prometheus R, Prometheus S, Morning Star, UD-8 Kayser, Circe, Lamprey, Maxim
FreeSpace 2
Bank Capacity Standard Loadout
1st 80 Harpoon
2nd 100 Hornet
Compatible Secondaries
MX-64, EMP Adv., Tempest, Hornet, Tornado, Harpoon, Trebuchet, TAG-A, TAG-B, Infyrno,

Modding Resources

File:Gtfherculesmarkii.jpg
The GTF Hercules Mark II in FS2_Open 3.6.10


Retail:

$POF File: fighter2t-02.pof
Textures: fighter2t-02(a/b/c), thruster01

MediaVP 3.6.10:

$POF File: fighter2t-02.pof
Textures: hercmap, fighter2t-02, glass, Damage, Tercoc01


History
Proposed by: ??? on ???
First WIP Post: ??? on ???
First In-Game Model: ??? on ???
Completed In-Game Model: ??? on ???
Final Corrections: ??? on ???


Gallery

Veteran Comments

Please read the Veteran Comments policy before editing this section.


The Herc II flies okay. My only complaint is with the weapons placement, as having the primaries set side by side makes shooting a fleeing target with horizontal deflection tricky. The secondary max loadout is a blessing, sometimes I like to load out on nothing but Harpoons and be a mobile SAM launcher.


I like all the Hercs. Good armour with large missile capacity, although a bit on the slow side, but decent maneuverability.


The Herc II gets introduced rather cruelly to you; in your first mission in the fighter you are thrown against Shivan Maras and Astaroths, both of which can outmaneuver and outrun you with ease. A Lion at the Door demonstrates the problems with the Herc II in rather brutal fashion on high difficulties. Mystery of the Trinity can end up subjecting you to SF Dragons to boot, for the ultimate in bad introductions; survival of that situation is difficult on ANY difficulty.


Despite this the fighter is a capable heavy assault ship; its spacious secondary bays and having only four gun banks appear to be a reaction to and endorsement of the Hornet-spam technique for dealing with enemy logistics craft and cruisers.


The problem with the Herc II is the early missions, where it's the required fighter, often just aren't well suited to pure heavy fighter forces, which leaves some people with the impression it is an inferior ship overall. It really isn't. It's quite a good ship for Clash of the Titans II or Dunkerque for instance, and it's my preferred ship for Proving Grounds.


While in the main campaign the Herc II is pretty much useless, in user-made campaign missions with lots of enemies, the Herc II is a godsend (provided that you have the right weapons, and no other ships like the Erinyes are available). Its thick armour and shielding is enough to get you through the fiercest of battles.


It's surprisingly maneuverable, but is slow as hell. Its thick armour, heavy shielding and huge secondary banks give you the opportunity to survive long missions without support, like Love the Treason. However, the Tauret is a better assault fighter, with more guns, even more missiles and less maneuverability.

This ship takes more after the *SF Basilisk* than after the Hercules Mk. II's predecessor, the Original Hercules. Just look at the gun slots. Both the Herc II and the Basilisk have two guns per slot. The Herc I has four guns in the first slot and two in the second. Also, the Herc Mk. II has the *exact* same missile capacity of the Basilisk. Both are designed to be more manueverable heavy assault craft. The main differences are that the Herc Mk. II has a slightly slower turn time than the Basilisk (according to the ship tables), the Herc II's default max velocity (assuming that energy is equally diverted to guns, shields and afterburner) is 55 while the Basilisk appears to be at 65, the Herc II has more hull hit points than the Basilisk but has fewer shield hit points than the Basilisk.