Difference between revisions of "GVF Serapis"

From FreeSpace Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m
(Veteran Comments: Policyediting)
 
(14 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{FS12_Ships}}
 
{{FS12_Ships}}
{{shipimage|image=[[image:serapis320x240.jpg]]|caption=The GVF Serapis}}
+
The '''GVF ''Serapis''''' was the mainstay interceptor fighter for the Vasudan navy after its development following the [[Great War]]. While the ''Serapis'' suffers from a weak shield system, thin armor and a small secondary bank, it makes up for these drawbacks with high marks for agility and speed and having excellent weapons compatibility.
 
+
{{shipimage|image=[[image:Gvfserapis-old.jpg]]|caption=The GVF Serapis}}
The '''GVF Serapis''' was the mainstay interceptor fighter for the Vasudan navy after its development following the [[Great War]].  
 
  
 
==Description:==
 
==Description:==
Line 13: Line 12:
  
 
===Name origin===
 
===Name origin===
Serapis was a Hellenistic-Egyptian god.  Unlike most Egyptian deities, Serapis was potrayed as all-human.
+
Serapis was a Hellenistic-Egyptian god.  Unlike most Egyptian deities, Serapis was portrayed as all-human.
  
 
==Performance:==
 
==Performance:==
 
===Statistics===
 
===Statistics===
{{Ship Stats|Advanced Interceptor|Akheton Corporation|Excellent|75.0 - 78.0|135.0|Light|220|200|14}}
+
{{Ship Stats|Advanced Interceptor|Akheton Corporation|Excellent|2.6, 2.2, 2.8|75.0 - 78.0|135.0|Light|220|200|14}}
  
 
===Armaments===
 
===Armaments===
Line 61: Line 60:
 
| colspan=3| Compatible Secondaries
 
| colspan=3| Compatible Secondaries
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan=3| [[GTM MX-64|MX-64]], [[GTM EMP. Adv|Emp. Adv]], [[GTM Tempest|Tempest]], [[GTM Harpoon|Harpoon]], [[GTM Hornet|Hornet]], [[GTM Tornado|Tornado]], [[GTM TAG-B|TAG-B]]
+
| colspan=3| [[GTM MX-64|MX-64]], [[GTM EMP Adv.|EMP Adv.]], [[GTM Tempest|Tempest]], [[GTM Harpoon|Harpoon]], [[GTM Hornet|Hornet]], [[GTM Tornado|Tornado]], [[GTM TAG-B|TAG-B]]
 
|}
 
|}
  
 +
==Modding Resources==
 +
[[Image:HTL Serapis.png|thumb|right|480px|HTL Serapis.]]
 +
'''Retail''':
 +
:$POF File: fighter2v-01.pof
 +
:Textures: fighter2v-01a(/b/CD), thruster01
  
==Veteran Comments==
+
'''MediaVPs 3.6.14''':
{{comment|
+
:$POF File: Serapis.pof
''The Serapis is deployed as if it were a space superiority fighter in the Vasudan missions of the Main Campaign, but don't let that fool you. This is in fact a civilian ultralight for airshows. While that sounds harsh, it is unfortunately rather true. A joy to simply fly thanks to its speed and maneuverability, the Serapis is also disturbingly fragile, at least as much as the FS1-era [[GTF Valkyrie]] if not more so. The Serapis has an extremely high attrition rate in combat: AI pilots drop like flies in it. Give them Taurets, Horuses, or Seths instead during the main campaign.''
+
:Textures: Serapis, Serapis-glass
 +
:Model and textures by: The Dagger
 +
:Release thread: [http://www.hard-light.net/forums/index.php?topic=85858.0]
 +
:p3d model: [http://p3d.in/kiFtb]
  
 +
==Gallery==
 +
<gallery>
 +
Image:RScreen0093.jpg | A USerapis in the [[Inferno]] mod.
 +
</gallery>
  
''The Serapis is a light interceptor which was not designed to survive in prolonged battles. Those who liked flying the [[GVF Horus]] or the [[GVF Thoth]] will probably like this fighter as it is superior to its predecessors. The main strength of the Serapis is its weapon compatibility. A pilot who prefers intercepting fighters to doing heavy assault will most likely prefer this during the Vasudan missions. It is to be noted that most Terran interceptors have better combat performance though.''
 
  
 +
==Veteran Comments==
 +
{{comment|
 +
''The Serapis is deployed as if it were a space superiority fighter in the Vasudan missions of the Main Campaign, but don't let that fool you. This is in fact a civilian ultralight for airshows. While that sounds harsh, it is unfortunately rather true. A joy to simply fly thanks to its speed and maneuverability, the Serapis is also disturbingly fragile, at least as much as the FS1-era [[GTF Valkyrie]] if not more so. The Serapis has an extremely high attrition rate in combat: AI pilots drop like flies in it. Give them Taurets, Horuses, or Seths instead during the main campaign.
  
''The only real reason you should choose this is for the fact that it is the only Vasudan fighter compatible with the Maxim. Its maneuverability and moderate speed makes it good for getting behind bombers and chalking them off, but its lack of armor and shielding make it a bad choice for all but the most skilled of players in engaging other fighters.''
+
The sole saving grace of the Serapis is its ability to mount the [[Maxim]]; the most rational use of the design is to engage from stand-off range, 2km or more, against logistics craft or cruisers and flee when enemy fighters get near.''
  
  
''This fighter is useless. It has less shielding and actually goes '''slower''' than the Valkyrie of old. Its only saving grace is its ability to carry the Maxim and its extra missile bank (which is minuscule anyway). Always use the Tauret or Horus when you can, rather than this paper-thin pair of wings.''
+
''The Serapis is a light interceptor which was not designed to survive in prolonged battles. Those who liked flying the [[GVF Horus]] or the [[GVF Thoth]] will probably like this fighter as it is superior to its predecessors. The main strength of the Serapis is its weapon compatibility. A pilot who prefers intercepting fighters to doing heavy assault will most likely prefer this during the Vasudan missions. It is to be noted that most Terran interceptors have better combat performance though.''
  
  
''"Some Terran pilots who've been privileged enough to fly it claim to prefer it to any Terran fighter." This is because they're idiots. The Serapis is slower than the Horus, has weaker shields and armour, and is only marginally more manoueverable. Its only advantage is the extra missile capacity, but since you'll die before you can use them, this isn't much of an advantage. Whoever classed this as an "Advanced" interceptor is having a joke. And as for comparing it to Terran fighters...''
+
''The Serapis is slower than the Horus, has weaker shields and armour, and is only marginally more manoueverable. Its only advantage is the extra missile capacity, but since you'll die before you can use them, this isn't much of an advantage.''
  
  
''The Horus is a far better interceptor than this thing. Intercept needs high speed, good manoeuvrability. While this is one of the most manoeuvrable fighters you will ever have access to in the game, it just doesn't have the speed to do intercept. One thing to note, however, is that in the right hands, it is a surprisingly capable dogfighter. But it is extremely fragile, to the point that you may want to reroute some power to shields. You really can't take more than a few hits. But overall I find it much more like the Ulysses than anything else. It's a supreme dogfighter like it, but it cannot stand prolonged combat, even less so than the Ulysses. However, it does have a second secondary (Giving it more versatility and a total capacity more than twice the size), and it does have a Maxim, which is a bit odd, but allows it an option when dealing with warships, and makes it good for hunting down transports, freighters and miners.''
+
''Intercept needs high speed, good manoeuvrability. While this is one of the most manoeuvrable fighters you will ever have access to in the game, it just doesn't have the speed to do intercept. One thing to note, however, is that in the right hands, it is a surprisingly capable dogfighter. But it is extremely fragile, to the point that you may want to reroute some power to shields. You really can't take more than a few hits. But overall I find it much more like the Ulysses than anything else. It's a supreme dogfighter like it, but it cannot stand prolonged combat, even less so than the Ulysses. However, it does have a second secondary (giving it more versatility and a total capacity more than twice the size).''
  
  
''The Serapis can fly, but it's made out of tracing paper; I've seen a video where the front quadrant of a Serapis — at full power, by the way — was completely taken down by just one hit from a Shivan laser mounted on the rear of a [[SC Rakshasa|Rakshasa]] (a second shot knocked the Serapis's hull integrity from 100% to 79%). It has a few advantages over the Horus, however, in that it can carry the Maxim, and that it lacks the inertia of the Horus while pitching. This is why I would rather use this ship for intercept than use the Horus.''
+
''The Serapis lacks the inertia of the Horus while pitching, which makes it more capable at dogfighting in close quarters despite its armour deficiency. This is why I would rather use this ship than the Horus, even when it comes to interception.''
  
  
''It is worth mentioning that the Serapis has a higher energy output than anything short of an Ares or Mara, 70% more than a Perseus or Ulysses. The fast recharge and excellent handling make this very survivable if one takes being shot at seriously instead of shrugging it off and finishing the current target first (bad idea given the low shield capacity). I find it the ideal craft for destroying waves of fighters and taking cheap shots at capital ships with Maxims in between. If this was compatible with Kaysers (putting all that power to good use), I would prefer this over any Terran fighter.''
+
''It is worth mentioning that the Serapis has a higher energy output than anything short of an Ares or Mara, 70% more than a Perseus or Ulysses. The fast recharge and excellent handling make this very survivable if one takes being shot at seriously instead of shrugging it off and finishing the current target first (bad idea given the low shield capacity). I find it the ideal craft for destroying waves of fighters and taking cheap shots at capital ships with Maxims in between.''
  
  
''I could never adapt to Vasudan ships. Their philosophy of having faster, weaker craft seems to plague even their most heavy bombers. Especially for the AI, maneuverability and speed doesn't seem to save them. The Perseus is by far a better craft, having nearly equal loadout and handling, equal primaries, and is even faster in both normal and afterburner speeds! Though, as mentioned above, the Serapis has much better energy recharge, that's not the biggest help if you have a number of enemies on you, which makes it hard to quickly take them out. The Perseus also can't carry Maxims, but given the plethora of other craft available, there's much better options than this.''
+
''I could never adapt to Vasudan ships. Their philosophy of having faster, weaker craft seems to plague even their heaviest bombers. Especially for the AI, maneuverability and speed doesn't seem to save them. The Perseus is by far a better craft, having nearly equal loadout and handling, equal primaries, and is even faster in both normal and afterburner speeds! The Serapis has much better energy recharge, but that's not the biggest help if you have a number of enemies on you, which makes it hard to quickly take them out. The Perseus also can't carry Maxims, but given the plethora of other craft available, there are much better options than this.''
  
  
''Also note that the Serapis's primary placement is just better than that of the other light Vasudan fighters. Its higher accuracy may save some lives, but to be honest, it would indeed require more hitpoints.''}}
+
''Also note that the Serapis's primary placement is just better than that of the other light Vasudan fighters. Its higher accuracy may save some lives, but to be honest, it would indeed require more hitpoints. In fact, the firing points almost reflect the old Valkyrie's (two on the external wing mounts, two directly close together on the nose in an Y--XX--Y fashion, where X is mount 1 and Y is mount 2).''}}
 
[[Category:Ship]]
 
[[Category:Ship]]

Latest revision as of 06:56, 21 June 2020

Terran ships
Fighters
Bombers
Transports and freighters
Cruisers
Capital ships
Installations
Misc Ships
Sentry Guns
Cargo Containers
Vasudan ships
Fighters
Bombers
Transports and freighters
Cruisers
Capital ships
Misc Ships
Sentry Guns
Cargo Containers
Shivan ships
Fighters
Bombers
Transports and freighters
Cruisers
Capital ships
Sentry Guns
Cargo Containers
Notable ships of FreeSpace 1


Terran ships
Fighters
Bombers
Transports and freighters
Cruisers and corvettes
Capital ships
Installations
Misc ships
Sentry Guns
Cargo Containers
Vasudan ships
Fighters
Bombers
Transports and freighters
Cruisers and corvettes
Capital ships
Misc ships
Sentry Guns
Cargo Containers
Shivan ships
Fighters
Bombers
Transports and freighters
Cruisers and corvettes
Capital ships
Misc ships
Sentry Guns
Cargo Containers
Notable ships of FreeSpace 2



The GVF Serapis was the mainstay interceptor fighter for the Vasudan navy after its development following the Great War. While the Serapis suffers from a weak shield system, thin armor and a small secondary bank, it makes up for these drawbacks with high marks for agility and speed and having excellent weapons compatibility.

Gvfserapis-old.jpg
The GVF Serapis


Description:

FS2 Tech Room Description

Fast and highly maneuverable, the GVF Serapis is primarily used as a bomber interceptor. Its thin armor and weak shields give it a low survival rate in dogfights against more heavily armored fighters. Despite having only two primary and secondary weapon banks, the Serapis has been retrofitted to accommodate almost any loadout in the GTVA arsenal. Veteran Vasudan pilots love the Serapis for its agility and loadout options. Some Terran pilots who've been privileged enough to fly it claim to prefer it to any Terran fighter.

Developer Notes

None

Name origin

Serapis was a Hellenistic-Egyptian god. Unlike most Egyptian deities, Serapis was portrayed as all-human.

Performance:

Statistics

Type Advanced Interceptor
Manufacturer Akheton Corporation
Maneuverability Excellent
Yaw, Pitch, Roll 2.6, 2.2, 2.8 s
Max Velocity 75.0 - 78.0 ms-1
Max Afterburner Velocity 135.0 ms-1
Armor Light
Hitpoints 220
Shields 200
Length 14 m


Armaments

FreeSpace 2
Bank Guns Standard Loadout
1st 2 Prometheus R
2nd 2 Akheton SDG
Compatible Primaries
Mekhu HL-7, Akheton SDG, Prometheus R, Prometheus S, Morning Star, Lamprey, Circe, Maxim
FreeSpace 2
Bank Capacity Standard Loadout
1st 60 Harpoon
2nd 30 Harpoon
Compatible Secondaries
MX-64, EMP Adv., Tempest, Harpoon, Hornet, Tornado, TAG-B

Modding Resources

HTL Serapis.

Retail:

$POF File: fighter2v-01.pof
Textures: fighter2v-01a(/b/CD), thruster01

MediaVPs 3.6.14:

$POF File: Serapis.pof
Textures: Serapis, Serapis-glass
Model and textures by: The Dagger
Release thread: [1]
p3d model: [2]

Gallery


Veteran Comments

Please read the Veteran Comments policy before editing this section.


The Serapis is deployed as if it were a space superiority fighter in the Vasudan missions of the Main Campaign, but don't let that fool you. This is in fact a civilian ultralight for airshows. While that sounds harsh, it is unfortunately rather true. A joy to simply fly thanks to its speed and maneuverability, the Serapis is also disturbingly fragile, at least as much as the FS1-era GTF Valkyrie if not more so. The Serapis has an extremely high attrition rate in combat: AI pilots drop like flies in it. Give them Taurets, Horuses, or Seths instead during the main campaign.

The sole saving grace of the Serapis is its ability to mount the Maxim; the most rational use of the design is to engage from stand-off range, 2km or more, against logistics craft or cruisers and flee when enemy fighters get near.


The Serapis is a light interceptor which was not designed to survive in prolonged battles. Those who liked flying the GVF Horus or the GVF Thoth will probably like this fighter as it is superior to its predecessors. The main strength of the Serapis is its weapon compatibility. A pilot who prefers intercepting fighters to doing heavy assault will most likely prefer this during the Vasudan missions. It is to be noted that most Terran interceptors have better combat performance though.


The Serapis is slower than the Horus, has weaker shields and armour, and is only marginally more manoueverable. Its only advantage is the extra missile capacity, but since you'll die before you can use them, this isn't much of an advantage.


Intercept needs high speed, good manoeuvrability. While this is one of the most manoeuvrable fighters you will ever have access to in the game, it just doesn't have the speed to do intercept. One thing to note, however, is that in the right hands, it is a surprisingly capable dogfighter. But it is extremely fragile, to the point that you may want to reroute some power to shields. You really can't take more than a few hits. But overall I find it much more like the Ulysses than anything else. It's a supreme dogfighter like it, but it cannot stand prolonged combat, even less so than the Ulysses. However, it does have a second secondary (giving it more versatility and a total capacity more than twice the size).


The Serapis lacks the inertia of the Horus while pitching, which makes it more capable at dogfighting in close quarters despite its armour deficiency. This is why I would rather use this ship than the Horus, even when it comes to interception.


It is worth mentioning that the Serapis has a higher energy output than anything short of an Ares or Mara, 70% more than a Perseus or Ulysses. The fast recharge and excellent handling make this very survivable if one takes being shot at seriously instead of shrugging it off and finishing the current target first (bad idea given the low shield capacity). I find it the ideal craft for destroying waves of fighters and taking cheap shots at capital ships with Maxims in between.


I could never adapt to Vasudan ships. Their philosophy of having faster, weaker craft seems to plague even their heaviest bombers. Especially for the AI, maneuverability and speed doesn't seem to save them. The Perseus is by far a better craft, having nearly equal loadout and handling, equal primaries, and is even faster in both normal and afterburner speeds! The Serapis has much better energy recharge, but that's not the biggest help if you have a number of enemies on you, which makes it hard to quickly take them out. The Perseus also can't carry Maxims, but given the plethora of other craft available, there are much better options than this.


Also note that the Serapis's primary placement is just better than that of the other light Vasudan fighters. Its higher accuracy may save some lives, but to be honest, it would indeed require more hitpoints. In fact, the firing points almost reflect the old Valkyrie's (two on the external wing mounts, two directly close together on the nose in an Y--XX--Y fashion, where X is mount 1 and Y is mount 2).